User talk:Andyhenkelman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Your edit to Andyhenkelman
Your recent edit to Andyhenkelman (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 02:03, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
Since your username is the same as the name of the page you created, Andyhenkelman, it appears that you intended to create a user page. However, it is in the wrong namespace. If you want this to be your user page, move it to User:Andyhenkelman and place {{db-author}} on the resulting redirect. Otherwise, the page's contents will be deleted. Thank you. --Gray PorpoisePhocoenidae, not Delphinidae 02:51, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] An article you created
Hello! Andyhenkelman is not the appropriate spot to post information about yourself, because that's the encyclopedic part of the Wikipedia website. User:Andyhenkelman, however, is available for personal information about yourself. Please see Wikipedia:Introduction and Wikipedia:User page for more information. JDtalk 18:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Prends cette rose Pierre de Ronsard
I've added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Prends cette rose Pierre de Ronsard, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Prends cette rose Pierre de Ronsard. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. Tony Fox (arf!) 08:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Andrew Henkelman
A tag has been placed on Andrew Henkelman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Mentifisto 23:29, 3 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Andrew Henkelman
A tag has been placed on Andrew Henkelman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. meshach (talk) 05:24, 7 December 2007 (UTC)
