Talk:Ancient Egyptian architecture
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Egyptological subjects. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
This article covers subjects of relevance to Architecture. To participate, visit the WikiProject Architecture for more information. The current monthly improvement drive is Johannes Itten. |
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Top | This article has been rated as top-importance on the assessment scale. |
Contents |
[edit] Wikipedia:Article Improvement Drive
Architecture of Africa is currently nominated on Wikipedia:Article Improvement Drive. Come to this page and support it with your vote. Help us improve this article to featured status.--Fenice 08:45, 17 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] The mystery of this article (article needs anonymous locking)
For more than one year this article has hardly been renewed with anything profound, nor does the current article have any special appealing message or enlightenment. This article is pretty far from current events nor is it a shining example of a wiki standard article. Yet this article suffers from non-stop vandalism, - actually it is near the only edit going on, on this article for more than one year. ???? Because of the consistency I can only imagine that is 1-2 max 3 persons doing it over and over again. It is noting wild, but is steady and consistent. There is not a month that does not have its 5 rv or more. My proposal is to permanent lock this article for anonymous edit, and instant permanent ban any new user that vandalise this page. This article is never going to be anything reliable, with these, excuse me, idiots, every 2nd day vandalising it. Just my 2 –cent. Twthmoses 01:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] needs improvement
This article needs serious work. A lot of unsited information. And a large part of it is old-fashioned in tone. What the article should do is serve as an organizatinal map for other more specific articles. Brosi 14:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Vandalism
This page has been vandalised im am going to revert to the previous version but i think we should lock the article for editing from the general public —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Loosen Up (talk • contribs) 06:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC).
