Talk:Amn't
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Formed by analogy
Is there any evidence that amn't I formed "by analogy with" (and hence after) aren't you / isn't it? An alternative theory is that all three formed at the same time, along with shan't, hasn't, weren't, etc; with amn't I>an't I>ain't I>aren't I as later evolution in standard Englishes. jnestorius(talk) 22:10, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
- I have edited the text to remove the suggestion that it came after (i.e. I have removed the word "analogy"). I also added a bit about standard English equivalents of "I amn't" and "amn't I", but now I wonder ... Maybe my new sentence should either have "ain't" added, or be deleted! Snalwibma 00:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
- I've added the "ain't" versions. 4.235.117.133 01:27, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Nonstandard?
Isn't "amn't" standard in Scotland and Ireland? Should it be described as non-standard? Makerowner 15:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- You're right. "Nonstandard" now eliminated from the article. Snalwibma 16:42, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Pronunciation
- What is the current standard Hibernian pronunciation?
- Excuse my pet theory, but is there any evidence for amn't being substituted with aren't due to similarity of pronunciation, despite the grammatical incorrectness?
- --Rfsmit 18:53, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] NPOV
I have just removed this recent addition:
... "aren't I?" is, strictly speaking, incorrect. One does not say, "I are." Arguments have even been advanced for "ain't I?" (used in other dialects) as prefereable to "aren't I?" "Amn't I?" although odd-sounding to most English speakers, is in fact the only grammatical alternative to the more formal "Am I not?" and for this reason should perhaps be encouraged more widely.
– because it seems to me an expression of opinion, and therefore a breach of the neutral point of view policy. FWIW, here is my POV on the matter: Even allowing that "I are" is incorrect, it does not follow that "aren't I" is also wrong. Language doeesn't work like that! Snalwibma 19:38, 23 August 2007 (UTC) I are not sure about that. 4.88.92.112 (talk) 02:50, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

