Talk:American Association of Lutheran Churches

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Christianity Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.
Start	This article has been rated as start-class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

	American Association of Lutheran Churches is part of WikiProject Lutheranism, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Lutheranism on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to Lutheran churches, Lutheran theology and worship, and biographies of notable Lutherans. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start	This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.

There's another wikipedia article about a body called the Association of American Lutheran Churches, which sounds similar to the group discussed in this article (with the first two words being of the denomination's title being transposed). Could it be that the author of the other article simply got the name wrong, and ended up writing a duplicate article under the incorrect name? Could someone check this out? Thanks! Ropcat 22:32, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

I redirected that page to American Association of Lutheran Churches I believe that some make a mistake. Smith03 02:47, 4 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] NPOV

The following passage strikes me as too POV: The lack of theological rigor was apparent. The three strand approach could never work; it was schismatic at best and syncretism at worst. Some may have argued this, but since it's pretty clearly an opinion, the article should place those thoughts in someone else's mouth, and cite the source. Ropcat 22:01, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

The questionable text was removed in August. I've taken down the NPOV tag. PKT 19:42, 26 October 2006 (UTC)