User talk:Altruism/Archive 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Lok Satta party.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lok Satta party.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 06:09, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Relevant Template added. Tag removed. --AltruismT a l k - Contribs. 06:28, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kamma

Hi there! I hope I sorted this out OK - I deleted your freshly created Kamma (disambiguation) page and moved the old Kamma page there, so we would have a disambig page but with all it's ancient history preserved. Then I moved Kamma (caste) to Kamma and fixed up the double redirects. Let me know if there are any problems! --Stormie 12:14, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Kakarla Subba Rao

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have perfomed a web search with the contents of Kakarla Subba Rao, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.nims.info/kakarla/kakarla.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 09:29, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notability of D.L.N. Prasad

A tag has been placed on D.L.N. Prasad, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. WebHamster 11:27, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

1) That's why it's called "speedy". 2) I didn't delete it, only administrators can do that, I just flagged it. WebHamster 12:00, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
Hohoho...please assume good faith even regarding actions of administrators. I'm not responsible if you perceive my action as high-handed and did not conform to your expectations. The article didn't ascertain notability in the least, and I followed the link provided and dropped on a kind of yellow pages for doctors. What else can putting up the name of a non-notable plastic surgeon be? You are of course free to recreate the article with notability established, or bring this up at WP:DRV. Regards. Lectonar 15:29, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The list

Unnecessary additions by the users without proper thought will make the retention difficult. I am unable to spend much time in Wiki. I appreciate your efforts to keep things moving.Kumarrao 13:48, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Babu , Please stop u r kamma feeling even on wikipedia . This is a place to give the true picture of people. Whatever I wrote about that Kamma NTR is correct . DO you think it's wrong. Don't you love him because he is a Kamma. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.242.2.233 (talk) 05:34, August 21, 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chiranjeevi Charitable Trust

Well, it certainly reads like an advertisement, it's virtually an orphan article (only one real incoming link, from Allu Rama Lingaiah), there are no sources whatsoever mentioned. However I'd hesitate to speedily delete it since "The blood bank of the CCT served over 70000 people in last 8 years, which itself a record" certainly is at least an assertion of notability. Perhaps the best solution would be to trim it down and merge it into Chiranjeevi? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Stormie (talk • contribs).

[edit] Your "corrections"

Regarding your "corrections" ([1], [2], [3]), please don't do it anymore. The bots works just fine without your intervention and updates the counter as needed. If you do not understand the instructions, assume it works and don't touch it. Миша13 16:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Whatever. I wrote and run this bot and have fixed after you 3 times already. I'm not getting paid per page archived, so it's not my my loss, but nevertheless I was patiently showing you how to use the bot properly and without flooding my mailbox with error logs. Миша13 07:36, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] New Article

Please see Gottipati Brahmaiah. Deleted a sentence regarding the community support to TDP which is incorrect.Kumarrao 18:00, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Telugu script

Hiya! I've posted some stuff on Talk:Telugu script, would like to give the warring parties a chance to sort it out before protecting the page. --Stormie 07:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reason accepted. Please unblock.

My reasoning has been accepted by User:Jmlk17. But my block still continues (re-blocked by User:Blnguyen). --AltruismT a l k - Contribs. 09:23, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I still can't edit anything, long after being unblocked, after my reasoning for the "unfair block" was accepted. --AltruismT a l k - Contribs. 09:37, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

I think "User unblocked" but "IP blocked." Please unblock the IP address too. --AltruismT a l k - Contribs. 09:40, 24 August 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Re: highest temperature at Guntur City ..

Can you provide the official reference/link that you are talking about, regarding the temperature at the City itself where it exceeded to 50c? I checked various sources, but no where I find it exceeding to that much. Thanks for your help and cooperation. Gnt 13:44, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unfortunate

It is highly unfortunate that the bunch of rogue elephants are back to their old game. Wiki has become an easy trampling ground for them. I find that they have been doing the same mischief in many historical articles cutting across regions, languages, traditions, customs etc. It is a pity that wiki is a susceptile victim to these pests.Kumarrao 14:28, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reverts

How to revert to an old version skipping recent edits?Kumarrao 07:31, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Removal of tags in Kamma

Request you not to remove tags which have been put for a valid reason which has also been explained in the talk page here. Repetition of this will attract a warning on your talk page. By the way, you dont have to teach me what is nonsense, show some civility here... you dont own wiki or any article for that matter... -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits11:35, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Just add the appropriate tags, if necessary. Reserve the edit summary nonsense. eg. What did you mean by "Who wrote this article...." Don't you know who writes articles in Wikipedia? BTW I see that you are no stranger to this style of talking, as you've amply demonstrated in some of your earlier edits (1). So, learn civility and then preach. Most of your summaries were unnecessary for the tags you added. --AltruismT a l k - Contribs. 11:51, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
I also do see that you are no stranger in reverting articles without proper justifications ([4]) as you have also done here to the Kamma article. -- ¿Amar៛Talk to me/My edits12:18, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Yes, you are right. I should have given better thought to some rogues' actions. Unfortunately, words uttered can't be reversed unlike articles.--AltruismT a l k - Contribs. 12:22, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] You're Invited!

Hello! I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject Dravidian civilizations. We work on creating, expanding and making general changes to Dravidian related articles. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page! Thank You.

Wiki Raja 22:33, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] The Gang

I thought that the gang comprised of only four or five persons. Now, I understand that the number is around nine and they regularly help each other. I shall not be surprised if they correspond with each other by emails (so that they escape attention on Wiki) and try to silence inconvenient Users by all kinds of tactics. It is also a distinct possibility that a single person has multiple Usernames. Some of the members seemed to have got exalted status in Wiki which makes the efforts of well-meaning Users much more difficult.Kumarrao 14:44, 30 August 2007 (UTC)