User talk:Altan64
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
(78.176.236.37 (talk) 20:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC));
[edit] Speedy deletion of Ahmet Altan Ekşioğlu
A tag has been placed on Ahmet Altan Ekşioğlu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Niaz(Talk • Contribs) 14:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Meda Publications
A tag has been placed on Meda Publications requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. WEBURIEDOURSECRETSINTHEGARDENplay it cool. 22:22, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Büyük Kaçğun
A tag has been placed on Büyük Kaçğun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kubek15 - Talk, Userboxes, Contributions 13:11, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Büyük Kaçğun
Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Büyük Kaçğun, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 13:14, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Büyük Kaçğun
An editor has nominated Büyük Kaçğun, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Büyük Kaçğun and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 17:44, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Büyük Kaçğun
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We appreciate your contributionsto the Büyük Kaçğun article, but since this is the English Wikipedia, we cannot accept text in other languages. However, if this is an original article, perhaps you would like to translate it into English.
If you want to contribute in the Turkish language, your contributions are more than welcome at the Turkish Wikipedia. If you wish to have an article from the Turkish Wikipedia translated into English, make a request at Wikipedia:Translation.
You may also enjoy becoming a part of Wikipedia's effort to coordinate across different languages.
For more information, take a look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Happy editing!
- I copied your article to the Turkish Wikipedia at tr:Büyük Kaçğun. You are welcome to edit it there. Andreas (T) 20:33, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] January 2008
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Ahmet Altan Ekşioğlu. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.
Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.
If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. faithless (speak) 11:02, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Writing Composition Based on Works of Well Known Authors
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tiptoety talk 22:03, 29 January 2008 (UTC) Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia by creating the page Writing Composition Based on Works of Well Known Authors. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Compwhiz II(Talk)(Contribs) 22:04, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
This page has now been deleted for a number of reasons. The main one was that it contained a copyright notice, and copyright material is not permitted on Wikipedia unless released under an appropriate license.
Secondly the material appears to be a personal essay. Such material is not appropriate for an encyclopedia; there are plenty of places on the web where your personal writings can be posted. Please feel free to add more appropriate material to Wikipedia. DJ Clayworth (talk) 22:06, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. Tiptoety talk 22:10, 29 January 2008 (UTC) (78.176.236.37 (talk) 20:59, 5 February 2008 (UTC));
But why, why why? I cannot understand you. And you must inform me abour what I have done wrong., clearly. Whatever I have submitted to Vikipedia ar Vikipedi does not have any licence problems and they are my original works. Never mind. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.107.80.8 (talk) 00:48, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
- Exactly: original research is not allowed on Wikipedia, see: Wikipedia:Original research. Moreover, if you want to post material that does already exist on other web pages, you have to give explicit permission (see above). Andreas (T) 00:53, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Büyük Kaçğun
A tag has been placed on Büyük Kaçğun, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DarkAudit (talk) 22:04, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
