Talk:Alternative Egyptology
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Ancient Egypt, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Egyptological subjects. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| NA | This page is not an article and does not require a rating on the quality scale. |
| NA | This page is not an article and does not require a rating on the importance scale. |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Archaeology, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| NA | This article has been rated as NA-Class on the assessment scale. |
| NA | This article has been rated as NA-importance on the assessment scale. |
[edit] Copyedit
I've added a copyedit tag to this article again. Currently, no less than 8 sentences start with the words "Alternative Egyptology", making the article seem clumsy and repetitive. Robotman1974 20:18, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] delete or redirect
this is obviously fringecruft. If there is genuine academioc debate, it's a bona fide part of Egyptology proper (Glasgow Chronology). If there isn't, it's just kookery. This seems to be a lame attempt to boost the "credibility" of fringe literature (or crackpot webpages, as the case may be). dab (𒁳) 18:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
