From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
I am a student in high school in the US. As a fundamentalist Christian, I've added to (and edited) several pages relating to the Plymouth Brethren, including Plymouth Brethren, Exclusive Brethren, Gospel Hall Brethren, and Gospel Halls. Feel free to comment about God, the Bible, Creation, or fundamentalism (is that a word?) on my talk page; I'll be happy to answer your questions or start a friendly debate!
I also am an amateur writer of fanfiction (mainly on shurtugal.com's sister fanfiction site) and write random things for fun. I like art class and English class and manage to struggle through Algebra II (fun, fun) and Spanish. Recently, I've been playing a lot of DragonFable and MechQuest, two fantastic single-player online RPGs you can play in your browser for free, without any annoying downloads. (Like with Maplestory. I was all excited 'cause it's free... until I realize you have to download 65 MB of files. I promptly hit cancel and went back to farming the Labyrinth in MechQuest.) As you can probably infer, I've done quite a bit of editing on those two articles lately.
I also am learning the BASIC and TADS programming languages!! *excitement!*
Random Achievement of the Month: I wrote a parser for text adventures in JBASIC the other day. It was a lot easier than I thought it would be. Ooo! And now it can handle two-word commands! I can make ADVENT!
Random Happiness of the Month: AE MMO Alpha Testing opens TODAY!!! I'm a warrior, what are you?
[edit] My Faith
As previously stated, I am a fundamentalist Christian. I believe the Bible. All of it. Even the creation part. I see no reason for evolution to be true (no one's ever even given me good, convincing evidence for Darwin's theory) and I see no reason for the Bible to be false (no one's ever given me good, convincing evidence for it being wrong). So, yeah, I believe it. Feel free to argue with me over it on my discussion page- I'm open to anyone's evidence for or against my viewpoint!
[edit] Everything Else
If there's a problem with any of the pages I've added to or edited, please tell me on my talk page! I would love to fix it!
[edit] My Views
Disclaimer: The following pieces of writing are entirely my own, and are probably not supported by Wikipedia or many leading scientists, mostly because they refuse to consider the evidence. If you have a problem with my personal views on my personal userpage, take it up with me on my talkpage. It's the little tab at the top of your screen labeled "Talk".
I, as an intelligent member of the human race, have deducted by way of logic that evolution is a faulty theory based on wishful thinking and misinterpretations of data. There are many pieces of evidence I could put forth in support of this, but I'll focus on three main points:
[edit] The Second Law of Thermodynamics
The second law of thermodynamics states that order tends towards entropy. In laymen's terms, things tend toward chaos. Over time, organisms decay, rocks wear away, and errors build up in DNA. An orderly system will slowly become disorderly.
Strangely, evolutionists believe that out of the chaos of the primitive Earth they believe existed 4.5 billion years ago came the supreme order we see in the world today. Over time, they say, mutations built up in genes, bringing us to to the highly complex organisms we see today, like humans, crocodiles, and penguins.
Mutations are almost always harmful. This has been directly observed by scientists and is in accord with the second law of thermodynamics- indeed, over time, these mutations disrupt the normal order of life. However, evolutionists seem to believe that the very small percentage of non-harmful mutations, over billions of years, somehow created order. This is clearly not possible, if the law of thermodynamics is to be believed. If it is correct, then, we must logically conclude that evolution by means of random mutations is incorrect. As the second law of thermodynamics has been proved to such an extent that it is considered a law of science, we have to believe it over evolution.
[edit] Cell Theory
The cell theory has nine parts, accepted by virtually every scientist. Among other things, they state that cells are the basic unit of structure and function in living organisms and that all cells come from pre-existing cells. Again, the theory of evolution is contrary to this. It tries to say that the original cell did not come from a pre-existing cell. However, all of the evidence points towards the impossibility of having a cell without a pre-existing one, and so we must decide whether to believe cell theory or evolution. If cell theory is incorrect, all of modern biology and medicine is fundamentally wrong. I choose to believe cell theory, as it has never been proven wrong, and has often been proven right.
[edit] Microevolution vs. Macroevolution
Before I get into this topic, I should probably define the two words I will be using a lot: microevolution and macroevolution. I will be using "microevolution" to refer to small changes within a genus or species, such as the small genetic changes that changed wolves to the hundreds of dog breeds there are today. I will use "macroevolution" to refer to the large-scale changes that, according to evolution, changed reptiles to birds and so on.
Microevolution is accepted without question by almost every scientist and psuedo-scientist in the world today. It is easily observed in both nature and the laboratory. A wonderful example of this is Darwin's finches. An anestral species, probably blown in from the mainland in a storm, slowly adapted to the different environments on different islands. Eventually, several species of finches lived there, all with slightly different shaped beaks and slightly different behavior.
This microevolution is often used as evidence for the overall theory of evolution. However, microevolution (small changes within a species) is very different from macroevolution (large-scale changes from one organism to an entirely different organism). Macroevolution has never been observed in nature or the laboratory. It is not observable from the so-called fossil record, due to the embarrassing lack of transitionary fossils. In reality, there is no evidence for macroevolution at all, except that we humans want an excuse to deny the existence of God.
[edit] In Conclusion
In conclusion, I have to say that after examining the evidence, I cannot believe the theory of evolution. It is directly opposed to the second law of thermodynamics because it states that chaos turned to order. It rejects cell theory because it requires us to believe cells can come into existence without a pre-existing cell. Finally, it is not observable in nature and has no fossil evidence. The only evidence for it is found in microevolution, which really is very different from macroevolution. Thus, I do not believe in Darwin's theory of evolution. It is only a faulty theory based on man's denial of God's existance and willful misinterpretation of laws of science.
[edit] My Links
A few links to pages needed only by me, pretty much.
| This is a Wikipedia user page.
This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alinnisawest.
|
=1
