User talk:Aleenf1/Archive 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk page so quickly ;). --Chetblong (talk) 04:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Yes there are 2 that I would recommend, WP:TW and WP:HUG. Also if you want I can give you WP:ROLLBACK, which is very useful when reverting. I see you already have it. --Chetblong (talk) 04:32, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my user page. Fattyjwoods (Push my button) 02:48, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

...for answering my "help me" request the other day concerning Wikipedia images not loading in SeaMonkey. The problem turned out to be that the "image manager" in SeaMonkey (equivalent to the "content tab" in Firefox, I believe) had somehow decided to block images from Wikpiedia. Who knows why? Gremlins. Anyway, I unblocked the site and everything works. Thank you, again. Jeffmatt (talk) 15:54, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Jagadguru Kripalu Ji Maharaj

Thanks for your suggestion. This person is a sockpuppeteer who has been trying to remove this article for a long tim. Look at the talk page, and see a comment by Sfacets before he was banned from wikipedia. So whether i say why the article should be deleted or not, he will come back later under a different name and try to vandalize or remove the article.

Anyway, why should the article remain. I will comment on each accusation. 1.It may contain original research or unverifiable claims. Sfacets complained of this before. Every statment is sourced, so i dont see how it could be original research. 2. It may violate Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons. The rape allegations contain information that the claims were dropped. 3. It reads like a personal reflection or essay. I dont think it does. 4. It reads like an advertisement and needs to be rewritten from a neutral point of view. I changed some of the wordings. 5. It describes a work or element of fiction in a primarily in-universe style that may require cleanup. It doesnt. It describes a religious personality. Kripaluji Maharaj's beliefs and teachings may be unique to Hinduism, but they need to be stated. 6. It is an autobiography, or has been extensively edited by the subject, and may not conform to NPOV policy. There is no proof that Kripaluji Maharaj had anything to do with this article. As regard NPOV policy, SFacets complained about this before. Since that time, more sources have been cited. 7. It may contain improper references to self-published sources. It contains references to self-published sources wrt. his beliefs and teachings. Otherwise not. 8. It resembles a fan site. Sfacets tried to remove information stating that the rape allegations were dropped. Stating that the allegations were dropped doesnt make it a fan site. All the information is sourced, and i believe that it is mostly written in a neutral style. 9. I will put all this on the article's talk page.
86.40.200.221 (talk) 12:15, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


Thanks!
86.40.200.221 (talk) 12:36, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Vandaism revert on my userpage

Hi Aleenf1. Many thanks for reverting the vandalism to my userpage. Much appreciated, Gwernol 09:57, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

re:Thank you

Glad I could help! FusionMix 13:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

Virgin Nigeria destinations article

I agree a handful of destinations does not warrant a seprate article, but since Virgin Nigeria destinations article exists and shows up when searching for Virgin Nigeria, it should be allowed to be linked to the main airline article or be removed by you or other editors from search list.(202.133.72.200 (talk) 16:19, 1 May 2008 (UTC))

TAR Talk Page

Are you just dissatisfied that you failed to get my page deleted after I "insulted" your English? -_- Anyway, I'm not using the talk page as a forum. I'm just merely presenting the REALITY that there HAVE been sightings since the whole thing is disallowed on the main page via the Wiki Policy, which I really think is so ridiculous since the information is so concrete. I'm not inducing any discussion about this "unreliable" source that you keep complaining about (albeit the fact that these sources have been proven true so many times) but just presenting the fact of information for those who WANT to know. DanielTAR (talk) 09:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

If anything, I apologize for the "personal attack" on you. It was meant to be a passing remark. But what I am trying to bring across here is that sometimes, people upload things on Wikipedia not to harm the site and policies sometimes do not apply to everything. Yes, it is not press-verified sources but it's substantial enough to show something. Since it's not on the main page where everything apparently has to be encyclopedia-quality and verified, I don't see why discussing spoilers on talk pages are not allowed. Anyway, I don't wanna argue about this. It's really a waste of time. If you really don't want the information up there, it's fine. It's not like I'm benefiting from putting such things up anyway. I just know that people WANT to know about such things, even if its unverified. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanielTAR (talk • contribs) 09:16, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

From Spansign

I would like to express my gratitude for your reversion of vandalism on my UserPage - Spansign (talk) 18:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

You're welcome, however next time please make any comment on my talk page rather than in my user page. Thanks! --Aleenf1 08:03, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

2008 Thomas & Uber Cup

Wow, you've worked hard! Maybe it would be more clear if you just add the table classification of each group and the result between the teams, like in the 2006 Thomas & Uber Cup article, and then, create another article with the group matches details between the national teams and all the badmintonboxes of the groups. What do you think? Do you like the idea? MontanNito (talk) 19:17, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi ! Please note that Gelora Bung Karno is include the soccer field and another maintenance of sport. The 2008 Thomas & Uber Cup held in Istora Bung Karno not in the soccer field. Please note it. Thanks. Albert (talk) 14:09, 12 May 2008 (UTC)