Talk:Album (Public Image Limited album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Repo Man comparison

Regarding the following statement: "Additionally, Public Image Ltd.'s Album cover design and colors are very similar, if not identical, to the many generic items featured in 1984's Repo Man motion picture." Isn't it more likely that the concept is similar to generic products themselves? They certainly weren't/aren't unique to the film Repo Man. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 03:50, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

The colour scheme and layout is identical to that of Repo Man's products - with the connection to the punk scene, I would bet a large sum that PiL based Album on Repo Man. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ahubling (talkcontribs) 04:56, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

As I mentioned, the design concept (i.e. dark blue text on a white and light blue background) is the same as that of generic products (i.e. dark blue text on a white and light blue background). Generic brands were around before, and are not unique to, Repo Man. You would bet a large sum, based on what? A visual comparison between the two is original research. If the film specifically influenced the album design, then we should cite a reference to that effect. Thanks, -- Gyrofrog (talk) 13:32, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Read "Trivia" at the bottom left. Is this a legit enough citation? [1]

Thx —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ahubling (talkcontribs) 20:52, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

OK, I think that would work. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 13:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)