Talk:Albert Trott
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] | ||
 |
Albert Trott is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. | ||
 |
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian sports. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
 |
Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability Albert Trott is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details. |
||||||
| Start | This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale. | ||||||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||||||
|
|||||||
Novus homo? I can't work out what the phrase means in this context. Loganberry (Talk) 00:24, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
- A year has gone by, and there's been no explanation. If one isn't forthcoming, I'm going to take the phrase out. No point having a phrase that very few people understand unless it's explained. Loganberry (Talk) 01:30, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, that phrase has a pretty specific meaning, and it seems to me that that isn't it. It's probably best to remove it. I think the editor was trying to say something like "on his own dime", we could say something like "he paid his own passage to England"? -- Deville (Talk) 02:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- I've removed it, since the sentence seems to work perfectly well without it. Loganberry (Talk) 02:57, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, that phrase has a pretty specific meaning, and it seems to me that that isn't it. It's probably best to remove it. I think the editor was trying to say something like "on his own dime", we could say something like "he paid his own passage to England"? -- Deville (Talk) 02:28, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
