Talk:Alan McGilvray

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
This article is supported by the Sports and games work group.
cricket ball Click here for information about how the WikiProject assesses notability
Alan McGilvray is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Flag
Portal
Alan McGilvray is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Car Accident

I don't know if this has ever been reported anywhere, but I understand he was the driver in a car accident in Sydney in which a pedestrian was accidentally killed. I think this occurred sometime between the 1940s and the 1950s. The reason I know of this, is that the pedestrian was my uncle's brother. I'm certainly not wanting to blacken McGilvray's name (it was an accident), and I'd need to find a published source, but I'd appreciate another opinion as to whether this is an appropriate matter to include in his article. If it is factual, I can't see why not. Others may disagree. JackofOz 22:15, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

I'd say that its not worthy of a mention (with due respect to your uncle's brother), even if a source was found. If it was widely known and reported (which it doesn't seem to be), then maybe, but bad things do happen and they're not always encyclopaedic. That's my opinion anyway. —Moondyne 01:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Yes, I think that's a good way to look at it. Thanks, Moondyne. JackofOz 01:29, 23 April 2007 (UTC)