User talk:AirFrance358/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Stop wiping sockpuppet tags

Do not interfere with sockpuppet tags, as you did to User:Gabeyc, User:OverQQ, and User:BBOPOPOS. It is considered disruptive as it hides the connection between these accounts. If you wish to dispute these claims, you can do so by posting to WP:ANI, but your edits are opposed by both Nlu and me, and probably 24.136.230.38 (talk · contribs) as well. —dgiestc 02:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeatedly blanking sockpuppet tags after warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. —dgiestc 03:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

—dgiestc 03:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

How about the anom. user to stop doing contested things? I know you are doing it for Wikipedia.., but.. ??--AirFrance358 03:46, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Can you please release the block at least in the user page?

Release the block in user page.

All blocks are site-wide except for the user talk page. You can still make test-edits on this page, but disruptive behavior will result in even this page being locked. —dgiestc 03:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm not being disruptive... I think it is admin power abuses to block user in order to make user to learn lessons... Also, here is my suggestion; erase the note in the User:Gabeyc, User:BBOPOPOS, User:OverQQ. I found one thing true; User:63.135.11.194 is used by me. That's true since sometime I forget to sign up. You can keep that sign in User:63.135.11.194. However, other is not true. Here is my deal; erase the note in the users

pages and I will no longer states protests against User:NlyouBBang or many admins.--AirFrance358 04:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Unblock..

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "The original reason for blocking me was that I'm master of the puppets. I found that actually, they sometimes made AFD nomination on my articles; this proves that I'm not puppet of them. It's true that they and I are living in near-by, however. Also, it's true that 63.135.11.194 is sometimes used by me since sometimes I forgot to use sign in. However, since they are not my puppet, I'm innocent. Request unblocks until it is unblocked. Since I'm innocent, I will keep requesting this, if you keep saying that I'm sock puppeter. Well, you can add to that not puppet, but (suspected) supporter of User:Gabeyg."

Decline reason: "Declined, per plenty of reasons above. Abuse of the unblock template will result in a lengthier block, or protection of this page. — ⇒ SWATJester Denny Crane. 04:47, 14 May 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

  • Falsely attributed comments such as this do not help your credibility. --Kinu t/c 04:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Yes, I stopped! Booh... Hurray!

Cleared... -Yes, I give up putting unblock template because of some misunderstandings of many users. -So, I will no longer protest about the issues, but suggests the change from established master of sockpuppet to non or suspected master of sockpuppets. Release the block in user page.

All blocks are site-wide except for the user talk page. You can still make test-edits on this page, but disruptive behavior will result in even this page being locked. —dgiestc 03:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
I'm not being disruptive... I think it is admin power abuses to block user in order to make user to learn lessons... Also, here is my suggestion; erase the note in the User:Gabeyc, User:BBOPOPOS, User:OverQQ. I found one thing true; User:63.135.11.194 is used by me. That's true since sometime I forget to sign up. You can keep that sign in User:63.135.11.194. However, other is not true. Here is my deal; erase the note in the users

pages and I will no longer states protests against User:Nlyoucrasy or many admins.--AirFrance358 04:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

However, please remove the category:Sockpuppet of AirFrance358 and move it to Category:Suspected sockpuppet of AirFrance358. Do you say that Gabeyg is my puppet? It is same as me as it is my previous ID! It should not be considered as puppets, and the user page of Gabeyg should be redirected.--AirFrance358 20:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)math>E=MC2</math>

It was joke.. Sorry.. I'm sorry that I can not contribute to Wikipedia... --AirFrance358 21:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC) admin = courge + good + againstvandalism.