Talk:Air Pacific

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Air Pacific article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.	Aviation Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated projects or task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Airlines WikiProject

This article is part of WikiProject Fiji, a WikiProject related to the Republic of the Fiji Islands.

[edit] Centre alignment

The article has been reformatted to remove the centre alignment as it was causing all of the text beneath the table to appear centred rather than left justified. I could find no examples of other articles formatted in this way, per the request of M i k e y 86 but if there are some (or if you intended a different effect from the one you created), please cite and re-edit. Kind regards--Calabraxthis 18:29, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

M i k e y 86 , I can see that you are trying to act in good faith, but you are failing to appreciate the consequence of your centring. With the commands that you were using, you were not only centre aligning the table of aircraft which you added, but also the entirety of the text in the sections underneath the table (which looked horrendous). Have a look at my latest edit and see if you can live with compromise? The table should now still appear centred but the sections underneath will be left justified. Kind regards--Calabraxthis 06:29, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Merge

The separate articel on destinations seems out of place and pretty useless. I suggest it would belong better in the main articel. 68.39.174.238 17:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Oppose - common practice is that we have separate articles for airlines and their destinations. No reason to break the rule. Kransky 06:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Support - i think that's the right thing to say. Usually when the destinations list is as small as the Air Pacific one it stays in the same article - see Pacific Blue and Jetstar. IanRitchie 01:20, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

Support - destinations list seems short enough to merge it into the main article. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 02:58, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Support - destination lists are to be used when the article is far too big. However Air Pacific's destination list is small enough to fit in main article. --Arnzy (talk · contribs) 05:28, 11 January 2008 (UTC)