User talk:Aiemeus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

This account is a checkuser-confirmed sockpuppet of Smockroker (talk · contribs). Both accounts are extremely likely to be socks of the banned user Billy Ego (talk · contribs). Both are blocked indefinitely. MastCell Talk 22:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "This is a lie. This person MastCell is lying. I am not a checkuser-confirmed sockpuppet of Smockroker. How was this confirmed? I would like to see evidence because it just not true."


Decline reason: "I confirmed that a checkuser was run on this account. — Yamla (talk) 19:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Please wait, I'm contacting the blocking admin. --Yamla (talk) 00:26, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aiemeus (talkcontribs)

I believe there is something very shady going on. Please determine whether I am a "checkuser-confirmed sockpuppet of Smockroker (talk · contribs)" through official channels. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aiemeus (talkcontribs)

I did. --Yamla (talk) 01:46, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

What do you mean? Was the procedure done properly? Can you double check? I am absolutely certain that I am not a sockpuppet. This is the only name I have used. Do you check the I.P.? Please run the check again, because there is mistake or someone is lying. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aiemeus (talkcontribs)

The check was run properly. You are confirmed as a sockpuppet. --Yamla (talk) 01:58, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Where can I see the check? I swear to you I am not a sockpuppet. I guarantee. I will pay you $100 into your paypal account if the check is run by a non-involved party and it is found that I am a sockpuppet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aiemeus (talkcontribs)

The check was run by the non-involved admin, Alison (talk · contribs). You can not see the checkuser results because these are not made public. I decline to accept payment of the $100 but thank you for the offer. --Yamla (talk) 02:03, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

It's not true. Can you not just run a double check? You do know that mistakes can happen don't you? Give me the benefit of the doubt. You will be surprised. And please let another person of your choice do the check. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aiemeus (talkcontribs)

No. I am satisfied. You are free to contact a member of WP:ARBCOM but it is no longer appropriate to discuss the matter here. --Yamla (talk) 02:08, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

You're not a good advocate. A good advocate would request a double check because there is no harm in it. I don't understand what your purpose is if you just accept what they tell you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aiemeus (talkcontribs)

This page is now protected. You know how to take the matter further if you wish. --Yamla (talk) 02:11, 11 April 2008 (UTC)