User talk:Ai.kefu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ai.kefu

Contents

[edit] Huckabee

Thank you very much for your words on the Talk page in support of the criticism section. I don't know how much of the history you reviewed, but I appreciate seeing another editor with the same conclusions. ThuranX 03:47, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Hello again. Once again, AJA has deleted the criticism, even after another editor went through and removed a LARGE number of words and pharases within it not explicitly supported, but still leaving in the core information. Please review the page and leave a talk page message? Thank you. ThuranX 23:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for your support in finding a viable solution for this. ThuranX 02:15, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm getting genuinely frustrated here. In light of your long essay on notability, he's switching objections, again. Now he says the article is plagarized. I can no longer easily assume Good faith here. I believe it is his intent to obstruct the addition of the information to this article by any and all means. Please respond at the talk page. ThuranX 22:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
It's been over a week, and there's no reponse from AJA. Any thoughts? ThuranX 01:28, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
I've reverted AJA's last edit removing the section, and provided a lengthy challenge to him to do some of the work and create a list of detailed problems with the section, along with evidence and citations supporting his new assertions. ThuranX 22:14, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
He's at it, YET AGAIN. Please assist. Thank you. ThuranX 22:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
And again. Also, see my talk page. He's clearly ramping up for an AN/I or something. He's still not responding onthe talk though. ThuranX 21:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Can you take a look in there please? He's once again saying you never said anythign worthwhile about notability, that you and I are the bad editors, and on and on and on. I've got not more AGF to use on this. He's got a fully worked out alternate version of the page which he's working towards here: User:A.J.A./Tohu&Bohu/Huckabee ThuranX 22:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Dr. Condi Rice

You created a great graph for the Rice article, showing her historical popularity. Is it possible that you could up-date that through the present, or as near the present as possible? Thanks,--Getaway 14:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, please update the graoh as Rice's ratings are at her nadir and the graph is out of date. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.131.219.216 (talk) 03:18, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Image:6thCenturySinaiJesus.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:6thCenturySinaiJesus.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 21:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Madmedea 21:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free image (Image:Controlposter.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Controlposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 09:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Condi Graph?

The graph that shows Condi Rice's approval ratings hasn't been updated since, like, this time last year. I think it's time for an update, as I for one would like to see the statistic. --69.40.168.33 00:56, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism?

Why did you vandalize the List of Presidents of the United States?--Southern Texas 00:34, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of Opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2008

An article that you have been involved in editing, Opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2008, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2008. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 20:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ikebutton.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Ikebutton.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:11, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Nakedapeband.png

Thank you for uploading Image:Nakedapeband.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. asenine t/c 13:12, 14 April 2008 (UTC)