Talk:Agricultural Adjustment Act

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

]]]] == FF6699">Violin]]Girl 18:34, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] thomas amendment

Most of that stupid bitch section reads like a legal document. Could someone break it down so that the average joe could understand it?

[edit] General comments

I've problems with this--the AAA of 33 did more than described. Despite the name, the AAA[dministration] has its own history. The "soviet influence" is obviously one-sided. As a newbie, I'm trying to get up nerve to tackle revisions.Bharshaw 19:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

The paragraph is total nonsense and should be removed...

[edit] Legacy

Are any of this law's programs still in effect? Did it have an important impact on federal policy? -- Beland 00:51, 27 July 2007 (UTC)

Not likely, considering it was ruled unconstitutional in 1936. 74.8.67.5 (talk) 20:22, 16 April 2008 (UTC)Jax

[edit] Contradiction

'Despite the reduced production, food price increases between 1933 and 1937 were negligible. Consumers bore the brunt of higher food prices and were "horrified with its policy of enforced scarcity."'

If food price increases were negligible, then why would consumers need to "bore the brunt of higher food prices"? Were the food price increases negligible or significant?

Guideheads11 (talk) 22:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)