User talk:Agitatedpotato
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Speedy deletion of Telegarden
A tag has been placed on Telegarden requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — Parent5446 (t n c k e l) 23:05, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Telegarden-8x6-72dpi.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Telegarden-8x6-72dpi.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly hi! 02:18, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Image:Kengoldberg.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:Kengoldberg.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly hi! 02:19, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
I changed the CC to fit Wikipedia's guidelines - steve who took the photo (in the future, just email me to ask) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.68.214 (talk) 02:48, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Creative Commons licenses
Hi, AgitatedPotato - I saw your notes about the above images. Unfortunately the CC licenses on the photos above aren't considered "free" by Wikipedia standards because they don't allow commercial use or for people to make derivative works. The CC licenses acceptable here at Wikipedia are the Attribution and ShareAlike licenses. Kelly hi! 13:06, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Not sure if I have to repeat myself, but the image is now under a proper CC - steve who took it (I actually think I may have better photos of Ken - email me if you find one and want to use it) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.181.68.214 (talk) 02:49, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

