Talk:After This

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the After This article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	After This has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on February 24, 2008.
March 1, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

Books Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at in the comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) Literature Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class. Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale. Assessment comments This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

[edit] Length

I understand this article is rather short, but I have seen several other articles of shorter and similar lengths passed for GA status recently (I can list a few, should this be necessary.) So please take this into account when reviewing, as length is not included in the good article criteria. Cheers, Qst (talk) 22:15, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Length is fine. I'm putting it on hold because it's really close. It just needs a few more little things:

1. Be sure to specify the source of the image you use on the image's fair use rationale.
2. This sentence is confusing: Claire, the youngest, returns from a break and goes to her Catholic high school, showing a changed personality and increased self-confidence. Exactly what is this break? What was she like before?

-- Wrad (talk) 21:55, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

I'll do these now. Qst (talk) 22:03, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Both done. Qst (talk) 22:11, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Does the book say why she's different? What happened that summer? Wrad (talk) 22:15, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Nothing happened that summer. I searched numerous website, and it was just a break away from her home. Qst (talk) 22:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Looks good now. Wrad (talk) 22:24, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. This is my first GA which I've created from scratch. Qst (talk) 22:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)