From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article was nominated for deletion on 21 February 2008. The result of the discussion was No consensus; default to Keep. |
|
|
This article is within the scope of Companies WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of companies. If you would like to participate please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. |
| Start |
This article has been rated as start-Class on the assessment scale. |
| Mid |
This article has been rated as mid-importance on the assessment scale. |
This article is not promotional in any way. Its is a factual account of the existence of a company that has lots of users spread over all its sites. Each statement in the article is backed up with a reputable source that is not affiliated in any way with the company, and there is no statement of opinion anywhere in it.Teckdiva (talk) 19:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- You might want to elaborate a bit on why it is a notable organisation. Such short articles normally do not warrant the creation of encyclopedic pages. Yes, you have mentioned some references, but aren't company mergers/acqusitions commonplace these days? Give reference to news articles other than merger/acqusitions/company earnings and it would justify retaining this article. Thanks Shootthedevgru (talk) 01:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- I've added some sources that have nothing to do with the merger of Affinity and Monster. The main reason that Affinity is worth of note is the size of its user base. Many of the sites, such as policelink, have quite a substantial number users (at least 5 digits).Teckdiva (talk) 19:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
