Talk:AFC Champions League

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject on Football
Association football Portal
The article on AFC Champions League is supported by the WikiProject on Football, which is an attempt to improve the quality and coverage of Association football related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page; if you have any questions about the project or the article ratings below, please consult the FAQ.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

Contents

[edit] Champions Table

Perhaps the table with the champions/finals etc. could be broken up into two tables to more clearly identify the pre-champions league finals and those after the competition changed? -Mike 'TinTin'

Also, could it specify who won what? is the table the Asian Super cup?The Cup Winners Cup? Burning phoneix 19:08, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] One-year lag

I read from the A-League_06-07 article that the Australia representatives for each year will be the previous year's premiers and champions, not the current year, giving a one-year lag. Is this the same for other teams wrt their respective leagues or is Australia unusual in this? Pimlottc 04:08, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

Around the world it's not that uncommon. Some of the Nordic countries enter UEFA competions based on the previous season results. In Japan the winners of the Emperor's Cup also go into the next seaons champions league (in the same way the Australian teams do)Tancred 10:41, 13 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] New format and A-league club places

has the AFC Champions league increasing to 32 teams for 2006 been confirmed because I watched Total Football on FoxSports in Australia last night (10 Nov 2005), and they have said it will be very unlikly that a A-league team will be included for the champions league for 2006 because the a-league champions are not decided untill march 2006 and the draw made up for the AFC Champions league is done in december , they said it was still possible but very unlikly that the A-league teams will not be added untill 2007

aticle on this from theworldgame.com.au

A-League clubs Asian setback

Its now looking like the new format will start in 2007 --Tancred

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Seongnam logo.gif

Image:Seongnam logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:37, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Liaoning FC.jpg

Image:Liaoning FC.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 17:06, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sorting the list

Look http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Football_Championship , they don't have 3rd place anymore, but they still use 3rd place, and even 4th place in the all-time ranking, so don't remove the 3rd place just cause you don't like the results, 3rd place is used in ranking everywhere. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurdo777 (talk • contribs) 22:38, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

The 3rd place just added as a Bonus addition, there is no 3rd place value in this competition. Mussav (talk) 22:50, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

there was a 3rd place between 1971 to 2002, you can't determine value for it —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurdo777 (talk • contribs) 22:57, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

the 3rd place dose not decide which one is the most successful because simply it did not exist in all editions, so by deciding it on something dose not exist any more and in matter of fact is not valuable at all and canceled from the competition, is something incorrect. Mussav (talk) 23:02, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
in all rankings, 3rd place is the decider after 1st and 2nd, this is a universal rule. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kurdo777 (talk • contribs) 23:06, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Kurdo, assuming things like this without backing of some source should be refraimed. I think you guys should take it to Wikipedia:WikiProject Football and see what they say about the issue. Chaldean (talk) 06:31, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Most Successful Club