Wikipedia:Administrators open to recall/Past requests

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents


[edit] See also

[edit] Recalls

In believed to be chronological order

[edit] Piotrus 1

Admin: Piotrus (talk · contribs)
Request: made 23 June 2006; archived here
Result: Unsuccessful; threshold not met.

[edit] Merovingian

Admin: Merovingian (talk · contribs)
Request: made 19 July 2006; archived here
Result: Unsuccessful/withdrawn.

[edit] Crzrussian

Admin: Crzrussian (talk · contribs)
Request: made 7 August 2006; archived here
Result: Successful; threshold met. Crzrussian chose to resign rather than seek immediate reconfirmation, and was resysopped at RfA two months later.

[edit] Bunchofgrapes

Admin: Bunchofgrapes (talk · contribs)
Request: made 21 August 2006; archived here
Result: Unsuccessful; threshold not met.

[edit] Friday

Admin: Friday (talk · contribs)
Request: made 23 December 2006; archived here
Result: Unsuccessful; threshold not met.

[edit] Piotrus 2

Admin: Piotrus (talk · contribs)
Request: made 21 January 2007 by User:Irpen who saw Piotrus' conduct in the conflict with Ghirlandajo and Dr. Dan as "unethical" and "unbecoming for an admin"; archived here and here
Result: Unsuccessful, as only a single user made the request. Piotrus has specified his criteria (six editors in good standing by his own criteria, on a matter related to admin tools). Piotrus asserted that the matter is not related to the use of admin tools; the discussion ended 1) according to Irpen "after Piotrus repeatedly refused to answer" and 2) according to Piotrus 2) "before it was made clear" whether Irpen meets Piotrus' own criteria for good standing.

  • Comment. I will state here clearly for the future record that one of my requirements is "that the user should be neutral towards my person." Irpen is not neutral towards my person, as has been determined by ArbCom. I thought it was obvious then, and I certainly hope it is obvious now. EOT.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk 21:55, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Misza13

Admin: Misza13 (talk · contribs)
Request: made 10 May 2007 by User:Nae'blis, because of a bot used to block improper user names; archived here
Result: Unsuccessful. Only a single user made the request, several users disagreed, and the matter of recalling was not responded to any further.

[edit] Ryulong 1

Admin: Ryulong (talk · contribs)
Request: made 20 July 2007; over perceived newbie-biting and an overly harsh block; archived here
Result: After some discussion and an apology by Ryulong, the five requesters withdrew their request for a recall.

[edit] Ryulong 2

Admin: Ryulong (talk · contribs)
Request: made 24 August 2007; archived here
Result: Unsuccessful. Everyking asked what Ryulong's criteria for being recalled were; the response was that he had yet to flesh out those things, but was "unwilling to bend to [Everyking's] sudden whims for a lynching".

[edit] Durova

Admin: Durova (talk · contribs)
Request: begun 21 November 2007; archives 1 2 3 4 5
Result: Following recall requests made at her talk page, at AN/I, and in an RfC, together with escalation of the root issue to ArbComm, Durova resigned her adminship.

[edit] Mercury

Admin: Mercury (talk · contribs)
Request: begun 10 December 2007, based on Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Angela_Beesley, the block of !!, and his nonsupport for arbitration committee candidacy; to the relevant discussion.
Result: Recall was brought up on user talk. Mercury removed himself from the category, then later reconsidered and agreed to the recall proceedings. After the recall petition was certified and the recall RFC started, Mercury removed himself from the category again and declared the RFC closed. The next day Mercury requested that his bit be removed.

[edit] Keilana 1

Admin: Keilana (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves • rights)
Request: begun January 6, 2008, article candidates/Odyssey Number Five requested by User:Dihydrogen Monoxide after discussion on WT:RFA (currently found at Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship/Archive 111). The reconfirmation was successful, passing at 133/8/10 on January 13.

[edit] SirFozzie

Admin: SirFozzie (talk · contribs)
Request: begun 20 January 2008, started by User:PouponOnToast after discussions on user talk. The recall was withdrawn by PouponOnToast at the urging of others, without any further petitioners supporting, on January 21.

[edit] Elonka

Admin: Elonka (talk · contribs)
Request: begun 26 January 2008, started by User:PHG, apparently as part of a larger dispute. A number of other editors commented saying that the matter was a content dispute, that Elonka should not honor the request, or that the request was unnecessary. Elonka declined the request as not made in good faith, noting that it was made within 1/2 hour of PHG coming off a block (made by another admin), on 27 January. PHG commented on 30 January but no other editor supported the request.

[edit] Keilana 2

Admin: Keilana (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves • rights)
Request: begun January 31, 2008, requested by User talk:100%freehuman, who was later blocked for disruption and for abuse. discussed on her talk page, on AN/I, AN, and denounced widely. The request was then removed by clerk AndonicO as a bad-faith request.

[edit] Keilana 3

Admin: Keilana (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves • rights)
Request: begun February 2, 2008, requested by anon User talk:75.72.88.121 for protection of the page Palestinian people. The request was removed by admin Dreadstar.

[edit] SirFozzie 2

Admin: SirFozzie (talk • contribs • blocks • protects • deletions • moves • rights)
Request: begun 22:57, 8 May 2008 [1] by User talk:Kmweber for administrator warning Kmweber on Disruptive Editing and Civility. Recall did not reach threshold within alloted two weeks.