Talk:Administrative Appeals Tribunal

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag
Portal
 Administrative Appeals Tribunal is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject Australian law.
Assessment comments

In Australia commonwealth judges are a special class of official who have tenure as judges (but not in the AAT) until age 70. Although some members of the AAT are in fact judges, not all of them are. Therefore the edit.

[edit] Removal of text

Put back the text, sources quoted case references which can be followed if you wish. Any case/legislation commentary will *always* be *editorialized* if not you would end up with a list of cases and statutes which means nothing.

I removed a large block of text that consisted of editorializing and speculation and which lacked sources. Editors are reminded of our neutral point of view, our requirement for sources and our proscription on original research. Each of these by itself is sufficient reason to remove editorializing such as that which was present here. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 02:59, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

I've now placed a {{expansion}} tag on top, because the meat of the article has now been gutted, and requires replacing. enochlau (talk) 09:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Again replaced. UninvitedCompany/or person removing, needs to be specific, which part is he/she is refering to as all material parts are referenced to case and legislation. Be specific, not general.

Please do a proper analysis of your proposition. The analysis was neutral being directly a function of the constituional postions of the bodies as set out by he High court, in the same way, as y = mx + b is a straigh line eqaution, it is a functional nuetral description. Read understand and digest the implication and how the anayisis is situated in the legal regieme. That is the analysis pics out the consequences of an alternative solutions/implications of the rulings as a situatated in the consitution. TCE LLB (UNSW), MBBS (SYD)

I'm not the one who has been advocating the content's removal. Check the page's history and annoy the other users who have been removing it recently instead if you care so much about the text. enochlau (talk) 00:40, 5 December 2006 (UTC)