Talk:Action learning

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] The Graphic

Can anyone provide substantive evidence fo the claims made in the graphic? Some version of this crops up frequently but I have not seen any research to support it. I believe it has the staus of an urban myth. As it stands, without context, I believe it to be meaningless. steven (talk) 13:25, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

The graphic is indeed a myth that seems to keep doing the rounds. Check out the wiki entry on Edgar Dale and the Cone of Experience [1], and the referenced website that provides a detailed history and challenge to the myth. mike-dc (talk) 12 February 2008 —Preceding comment was added at 20:26, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] This article

This article really needs context for those of us who may not be familiar with the concepts being described. I also feel that the end section is a bit promotional. What do other editors think about this? janejellyroll 07:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Notable

I added the following line to address the idea of notability:

"The introduction of Revans's theory of Action Learning was cited by Stuart Crainer as one of the 75 Greatest Management Decisions Ever Made in his book of the same title."

I am not sure if it rises to the standard, but I came across this discussion as I was reading Cranier's book.

My .02! :) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Dragonrazer (talk • contribs) 20:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC).