Active SETI

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

A representation of the 1679-bit Arecibo message.

Active SETI (Active Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence) is the attempt to send messages to intelligent aliens. Active SETI messages are usually in the form of radio signals, however, physical messages like that of the Pioneer plaque may also be considered an active SETI message. Active SETI is also known as METI (Messaging to Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence), or positive SETI. Active SETI is contrasted to passive SETI, which only searches for signals, without any attempt to send them.

The term METI was coined by Russian scientist Alexander Zaitsev, who denoted the clear-cut distinction between Active SETI and METI:^[1]

The science known as SETI deals with searching for messages from aliens. METI science deals with the creation of messages to aliens. Thus, SETI and METI proponents have quite different perspectives. SETI scientists are in a position to address only the local question “does Active SETI make sense?” In other words, would it be reasonable, for SETI success, to transmit with the object of attracting ETI’s attention? In contrast to Active SETI, METI pursues not a local, but a more global purpose – to overcome the Great Silence in the Universe, bringing to our extraterrestrial neighbors the long-expected annunciation “You are not alone!”

1 Message construction
2 Realized projects
3 Perceived risk
4 Beacon proposal
5 References

[edit] Message construction

The lack of an established communications protocol is a challenge for METI.

Also characteristics of the radio signal such as wavelength, type of polarization, and modulation have to be considered.

[edit] Realized projects

Arecibo Message (1974)
Cosmic Call 1 (1999)
Teen Age Message (2001)
Cosmic Call 2 (2003)

These projects have targeted stars between 32 and 69 light-years from the Earth. The exception is the Arecibo message, which targeted Glob cluster M13, approximately 24000 light-years away. The first message to reach its destination will be Cosmic Call 2, which should reach Hip 4872 of Cassiopeia in April 2036.

Stars to which messages were sent, are the following:^[2]^[3]

Name	Designation	Constellation	Date sent	Arrival date	Message
Messier 13	NGC 6205	Hercules	1974-11-16November 16, 1974	approx. 25974	Arecibo Message
16 Cyg A	HD 186408	Cygnus	1999-05-24May 24, 1999	2069-11November 2069	Cosmic Call 1
15 Sge	HD 190406	Sagitta	1999-06-30June 30, 1999	2057-02February 2057	Cosmic Call 1
	HD 178428	Sagitta	1999-06-30June 30, 1999	2067-10October 2067	Cosmic Call 1
Gl 777	HD 190360	Cygnus	1999-07-01July 1, 1999	2051-04April 2051	Cosmic Call 1
	HD 197076	Delphinus	2000-08-29August 29, 2001	2070-02February 2070	Teen Age Message
47 UMa	HD 95128	Ursa Major	2001-09-03September 3, 2001	2047-07July 2047	Teen Age Message
37 Gem	HD 50692	Gemini	2001-09-03September 3, 2001	2057-12December 2057	Teen Age Message
	HD 126053	Virgo	2001-09-03September 3, 2001	2059-12January 2059	Teen Age Message
	HD 76151	Hydra	2001-09-04September 4, 2001	2057-05May 2057	Teen Age Message
	HD 193664	Draco	2001-09-04September 4, 2001	2059-01January 2059	Teen Age Message
	HIP 4872	Cassiopeia	2003-07-06July 6, 2003	2036-04April 2036	Cosmic Call 2
	HD 245409	Orion	2003-07-06July 6, 2003	2040-08August 2040	Cosmic Call 2
55 Cnc	HD 75732	Cancer	2003-07-06July 6, 2003	2044-05May 2044	Cosmic Call 2
	HD 10307	Andromeda	2003-07-06July 6, 2003	2044-09September 2044	Cosmic Call 2
47 UMa	HD 95128	Ursa Major	2003-07-06July 6, 2003	2049-05May 2049	Cosmic Call 2

[edit] Perceived risk

Active SETI has been heavily criticized due to the perceived risk of revealing the location of the Earth to alien civilizations, without some process of prior international consultation.

But some consider this as panic and irrational superstition, see: Sending and Searching for Interstellar Messages

To lend a quantitative basis to discussions of the risks of transmitting deliberate messages from Earth, the SETI Permanent Study Group of the International Academy of Astronautics [1] adopted in 2007 a new analytical tool, the San Marino Scale [2]. Developed by Prof. Ivan Almar and Prof. H. Paul Shuch, the San Marino Scale evaluates the significance of transmissions from Earth as a function of signal intensity and information content. Its adoption suggests that not all such transmissions are created equal, thus each must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis before establishing blanket international policy regarding Active SETI.

[edit] Beacon proposal

One proposal for a 10 billion watt interstellar SETI beacon was dismissed by Robert A. Freitas Jr. to be infeasible for a pre-Type I civilization on the Kardashev scale.^[4] However, this argument, dated from 1980, assumes omni-directional beacons, which may not be the best way to proceed. As a result it has been suggested that civilizations must advance into Type I before the energy required for reliable contact with other civilizations.^{[citation needed]} Advances in consumer electronics have made possible cheaper transmitters.^[5] This can reduce the power and cost to levels that are reasonable with current (2008) earth technology.

Once civilizations have discovered each others' locations, the energy requirements for maintaining contact and exchanging information can be significantly reduced through the use of highly directional transmission technologies. In 1974, the Arecibo Observatory transmitted a message toward the M13 globular cluster about 25,000 light-years away, for example, and the use of larger antennas or shorter wavelengths would allow transmissions of the same energy to be focused on even more remote targets, such as those attempted by Active SETI.