Talk:ACID Pro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Was the move in error?

I moved this article from "ACID (software)" to "ACID Music" but I am having second thoughts about this move. Could I have some input here as to whether this was an appropriate or inappropriate move? If it is deemed to have been inappropriate, I'll shepherd it through the administrative move process at WP:RM. Courtland 15:49, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

I think that "ACID (software)" seems better as there is a whole line of software called ACID. The article should at least mention that there were previous as well as other present versions of ACID out there. M. Stern 04:47, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Requested move

ACID Music → ACID Pro – {ACID Pro is the current name for the software} copied from the entry on the WP:RM page

[edit] Voting

Add *Support or *Oppose followed by an optional one-sentence explanation, then sign your vote with ~~~~
  • Support Borb 01:15, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Support Since ACID Music is the former name of the software --Lox (t,c) 16:17, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Discussion

Add any additional comments


This seems to be written in a corporate fashion. It looks almost as if it was taken from a website? I don't think the tone is proper for Wikipedia; my 2 cents. Diizy (talk) 22:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Article has been moved., redirects fixed.--Tznkai 11:58, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] ACIDplanet

I'm a devout member of the acidplanet community and I was wondering if any other ACID users also thought there should be a seperate page for ACIDplanet. I'd be happy to write it, I just don't want it to be struck down.

Be bold, man. Be bold. --69.138.91.29 02:47, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

God, this page stinks of advertising. 125.63.229.201 00:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Version history and changes?

It would not be cool to have a section that details each version of acid pro and the changes from version to version, and also display the current version. 71.126.12.86Surge

[edit] Listing XPress Separately?

The ACID_XPress_5.0 page raises this issue on its own page: should these be separate pages?

Personally, I would not have found out about the free edition if they had been merged. My sole concern is that somehow the free edition is given mention on the free audio software page. If that can be achieved even though the pages are merged, then fine. The Xpress page is a bit of a messy stub right now anyway. Erichero (talk) 11:30, 15 April 2008 (UTC)