From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| Stub |
This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. |
- Removed AMG link [1] as this points to a review of 'un-live' single. Alf 13:09, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- added date and location from "Illustrated Collectors Guide to Motorhead" and "White Line Fever" (Lemmy's autobiography). Alf 14:10, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- It was a re-release of the 1980s track that got into the charts as a re-entry in 1992, amend to reflect this. Alf 20:23, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Vote for Deletion
This article survived a Vote for Deletion. The discussion can be found here. -Splash 01:50, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
- Shouldn't this song article be merged with Ace of Spades (song)?
- Yes, it should. I did merge is ages ago and the original author reverted it. Then I put it up on vfd and it was kept. --Moochocoogle 23:59, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
- This definately should be in the Ace of Spades article. If you haven't noticed, all versions of one song are always on the same page. It doesn't matter if it was live, re-recorded, or a demo, or if it was released one of those versions of the song as a single. It's still the same song. On other pages where there's two versions of a song or single, they're listed together, with just two infoboxes. I dunno if there's any wikipedia guideline that says stuff has to be that way or not, but I know that all other songs with two versions are listed on the same page, and I see no reason why this page should be different. Same goes for Motorhead (song; live) --User:Rock Soldier 19:18, May 2 2007
- Wikipedia is not paper, I have noticed a number of times where articles about singles that cross over discographies are preferred by the readers as seperate. Ideally the encyclopedia would have a page for the song itself and its release by the composer if relevant, and mention of the other covers, where there is a desire for their inclusion in important enough band's discographies a page there is no problem, this is not a massive amount of pages. Until a better solution and sense of consensus, the status-quo is fine with me.--Alf melmac 23:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yawn. I'm getting bored with this "definately [sic] should be" attitude. How did people become so brainwashed? – B.hotep u/t• 22:23, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sheesh guys, why the heck didn't you call it "Hämeenlinna; live", we wouldn't even be having this conversation.--Alf melmac 22:55, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
