Talk:Acacia victoriae
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Writerhound, what happened with the editing? It looks like the article was fine up to when the psychoactive references and incorrect binomal name were added ie A.tenuifolia. I think such a major edit to an article should involve some discussion in this discussion page prior to the event. It was previously a well and authoritively referenced article and provided good information. Why did you wreck it in the first place? John Moss.
Categories: Plant articles needing photos | Stub-class plant articles | Low-importance plant articles | WikiProject Western Australia articles | Stub-Class Western Australia articles | Low-importance Western Australia articles | WikiProject Australian biota articles | Stub-Class Australian biota articles | Unknown-importance Australian biota articles | Stub-Class Australia articles | Low-importance Australia articles

