Talk:Abox

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Could be a good idea to merge Abox and Tbox articles. universimmedia 07:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

• Yes, I agree. highlunder 12:34, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

I am not an expert, but the example "All students are subclasses of Persons" does not seem to make sense: students certainly ARE not classes, the set of students might FORM a class. Similarly, subclasses are not likely to be of Persons but of the class formed by Persons. In some contexts it might not be necessary to point out these details, but in an illustrating example like here, I think it is.

So why not change the example to something like either: "Students are Persons" which describes the assertion as a statement about the individuals of the involved classes or "the class of Students is a subclass of the class of Persons" which explicitly describes the class relationship.

I am also in favor of mergin the TBOX and ABOX articles and maybe also mention RBOX. Johann Petrak 15:32, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

I agree, I made the change to "All Students are Persons" but don't have time to merge the articles. China Crisis 12:53, 8 June 2007 (UTC)