User talk:Abexy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A belated welcome to wikipedia.
Contents |
[edit] Infatuation/Linerance
Hi, it would be great if you re-wrote the limerance article. Anything not applicable can go to Infatuation. Rich Farmbrough 19:57, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
- It will be a while before I can get it up, probably not until January. I will look for more current works on the subject, but without them it may end up as a summary of Tennov's book. abexy 08:29, 25 November 2005 (UTC)
- Hi abexy, I've been sandbox-working on archiving part of the Limerence talk page, see here for more details. Thanks for all your work! Jaguara 21:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
-
- You're welcome! I think I've come to the conclusion that I'm better off editing articles and pages in subjects not of my study (such as limerence, which I only found when I typed "infatuation" in an IM window on Trillian and said, what, WP has a link to that? and clicked). A little less painful for me and those around me ^_^ 20:29, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] LOL HAY
sup homeboy ~Renee
[edit] doc hype
As you've been interested in the documentary hypothesis article in the past, I'd be grateful for your comments on my recent rewrite, if you have time. PiCo 14:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Limerence
An editor has nominated Limerence, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Limerence and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

