Talk:A Doctor's Report on Dianetics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the A Doctor's Report on Dianetics article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (~~~~). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability

	Books Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate, you can edit the article. You can discuss the Project at its talk page.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. See comments.

The Arbitration Committee has placed all Scientology-related articles on probation (see relevant arbitration case). Editors making disruptive edits may be banned by an administrator from this and related articles, or other reasonably related pages.

	Scientology Portal This article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Wikipedia's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale. See comments

An entry from A Doctor's Report on Dianetics appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on 7 May 2007.

	It is requested that a photograph or photographs of the book cover be included in this article to improve its quality.
	The Free Image Search Tool (FIST) may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

[edit] Started article

Started article, with (10) citations from reputable secondary sources. Now to find more citations and expand article. Could also use an image of the bookcover at some point... Smee 10:22, 2 May 2007 (UTC).

[edit] Neutrality

Winter was a disgruntled ex-partner of Hubbard. No way that this could be called a neutral 3rd-party opinion. --Justanother 11:51, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Winter may have been a disgruntled ex-partner, but that doesn't make the article non-neutral, it merely means this man's opinion may have been influenced. As long as his viewpoint is correctly shown here, the article is neutral. Madness 13:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

• Exactly. Smee 14:09, 7 May 2007 (UTC).