User talk:99.130.34.227
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Feminism appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you.
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Child support appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. DanielEng (talk) 01:25, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oysterguitarist 01:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to child support. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Slp1 (talk) 01:43, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
[edit] Your message
Sorry if you don't agree with Wiki policy, but your edits to child support violate both WP:NPOV and WP:PROVEIT. The idea that child support is a feminist, Marxist action is not supported by any mainstream analysis, and unless you can provide reliable, neutral sources, it will continue to be reverted. You might also want a read of WP:CIVIL, and remember that reverting the same article more than three times a day will get you blocked. DanielEng (talk) 01:46, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
- I concur with Daniel's comments above. If you can find reliable sources for your edits, no problem, but at the moment they appear to be your opinions rather than reliably sources encyclopedic material. --Slp1 (talk) 01:51, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Bearian (talk) 02:57, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] February 2008
Please do not use styles that are unusual or difficult to understand in articles, as you did to Boston Massacre. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. Wexcan (talk) 19:35, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
| | This is the discussion page for an anonymous user, identified by the user's numerical IP address. Some IP addresses change periodically, and may be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users. Registering also hides your IP address. [WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute • Geolocate • Tor check • Rangeblock finder] · [RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean] |

