User talk:98.212.132.208

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Talk:Chantal Claret

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Thank you. --neonwhite user page talk 20:21, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


Ah, sorry, didn't mean to upset an admin. You ARE an admin and have authority here, yes? (98.212.132.208 (talk) 20:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC))

I have never claimed any such thing. Templates are time savers to warn disruptive editors about there behaviour. Any edit is free to use them. --neonwhite user page talk 20:49, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Ah, so you have no actual authority on this site. That's all I needed to know, thank you for clarifying. (98.212.132.208 (talk) 21:04, 5 May 2008 (UTC))

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. --neonwhite user page talk 02:25, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

Please remember to assume good faith and this includes not threatening other wiki users. (98.212.132.208 (talk) 02:34, 6 May 2008 (UTC))

This guideline does not require that editors continue to assume good faith in the presence of evidence to the contrary. Actions inconsistent with good faith include repeated vandalism --neonwhite user page talk 02:43, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

I have not vandalized the page and edited in derogatory information, I have merely undone some of your bad faith changes and this is clearly something you are taking personally. I see that you have a similar approach to other pages and have had repeated conflicts regarding this. I suggest you find a more productive use of your time or, barring that, you contribute to the page in a manner which does not reflect your personal bias and/or need to wield authority. (98.212.132.208 (talk) 02:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC))

You have reverted good faith edits to this page including removing content, minor type and grammer edits and added unsourced info contrary to wikipedia policy, you have made personal attacks and accusations of bad faith on several accusations and continue to do so above, i have given you enough chances to stop this incivil behaviour and discuss the article properly. The last is your last chance to act properly. --neonwhite user page talk 02:58, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

I have given YOU enough chances as well. Please understand that you wield NO authority over me or any other editor. Stop assuming bad faith and let the changes speak for themselves. (98.212.132.208 (talk) 03:00, 6 May 2008 (UTC))

I am not claiming to. Please use the talk page properly to discuss improvements to the article. Good faith is only assumed until there is evidence otherwise. --neonwhite user page talk 03:06, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Indecisean for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. neonwhite user page talk 02:44, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] 3RR

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

[edit] Article talk pages

Per guidelines at Wikipedia:TALK#How_to_use_article_talk_pages. Talk pages are used for discussing improvements to the article. Irrelevant discussions are subject to removal. This is a simple clean up of irrelevant spam. There is no need to revert it. --neonwhite user page talk 01:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] May 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Zac Brown Band do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.  

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.

The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: '\bmyspace\.com' (link(s): http://www.myspace.com/zacbrownband) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! XLinkBot (talk) 23:53, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.