User talk:96.247.37.46

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Gregg Popovich‎ , did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kuru talk 23:28, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] April 2008

The recent edit you made to Manu Ginóbili constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. Thingg⊕⊗ 23:32, 27 April 2008 (UTC))

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Manu Ginóbili, you will be blocked from editing. Tiptoety talk 23:33, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Gregg Popovich. LegoKontribsTalkM 23:34, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


You have been blocked from editing for 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy as a result of your repeated abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} . Kuru talk 23:37, 27 April 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Dave Zirin Interview

Since you said you don't know what interview I'm talking about, here it is. Attributing to Zirin the statement "I believe Barry Bonds has never done steroids" is too strong in light of this interview, especially because he denies ever saying it. Anyways, here it is, judge for yourself:

Interview with Dave Zirin

1) Your Wikipedia entry claims that you "believe [Barry] Bonds has never done steroids." When you come off your LSD trip and check into rehab, would you rather share a suite with Lindsey Lohan or Britney Spears?

A: Ah. Wikipedia. The source of truth for the desperate college freshmen and terminally stupid among us. I never wrote that I "believe Bonds has never done steroids." I wrote a column in 2003 called "The Case For Reasonable Doubt" where I go through the ways Bonds was breaking many of the accepted truisms about roids: I wrote, The greatest case for reasonable doubt lies in Bonds' very late career success. His unparalleled middle-aged majesty screams his innocence. Steroids and rapid 'unnatural' muscle growth puts tremendous pressure on the joints and tendons. Admitted steroid users like Ken Caminiti, Jose Canseco, Lenny Dykstra and banned substance user Mark McGwire all saw their bodies break down as they hit their mid 30s…Bonds has thrived as he hurtles toward 40, not unlike Jerry Rice, Brett Favre, Reggie Miller, and Randy Johnson. To go by the rumors that surround him, Bonds' ankles should be snapping like toothpicks every time he jogs to first base. Also, worth mentioning that unlike oh so many others, the man never actually failed a steroids test. Is there a ton of circumstantial evidence that the man juiced? Absolutely. But he is still the best player I've ever seen. The best player of what will go down as the anabolic era.

[edit] Dave Zirin Again - What in 'I never wrote that I "believe Bonds has never done steroids."' do you not understand?????

Stop revising the article -- If you have verifiable information otherwise, please provide it.

[edit] May 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Gregg Popovich. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. KerotanLeave Me a Message Have a nice day :) 23:26, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Dave Zirin. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KerotanLeave Me a Message Have a nice day :) 23:30, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

Hi, the recent edit you made to Dave Zirin has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. treelo talk 11:11, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Dave Zirin edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Dave Zirin. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Pastordavid (talk) 16:00, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] re:

read the above notice.--KerotanLeave Me a Message Have a nice day :) 00:03, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] hello.

That's a nice dispute over content that you have there, which is all well and good, but your continual PAs and incivility to the people that are trying to work with you isn't, please play nice and heed WP:CIVIL and WP:AGF.--00:09, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] blocked

You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. To contest this block, please reply here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Pastordavid (talk) 00:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

.

talk) talk)] aka talk) aka. (talk) are all the same user making abusive edits on Dave Zirin Editor437 (talk) 09:24, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] This is a Vandal

These are all the same vandalous user: 122.3.11.211: talk 119.94.0.238: talk 96.247.37.46: talk 119.94.12.16: talk 119.94.3.120: talk

She/he makes edits while ignoring consensus, attacks other users, and refuses to discuss issues of talk pages. Editor437 (talk) 08:02, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Vandal Update

This vandal has used all these IPs: 122.3.11.211: talk 119.94.0.238: talk 96.247.37.46: talk 119.94.12.16: talk 119.94.3.120: talk 119.94.0.250: talk 122.144.118.160: talk 58.69.106.184: talk —Preceding unsigned comment added by Editor437 (talk • contribs) 18:27, 29 May 2008 (UTC)