User talk:91.105.30.90

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Munich air disaster, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Munich air disaster was changed by 91.105.30.90 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-06-01T00:49:33+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:49, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Munich air disaster. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Tcncv (talk) 00:51, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did to Palal, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tcncv (talk) 01:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Doncaster Rovers F.C.. Kerotan-Have a nice day :) 01:13, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Hello

Please don't give other users the impression that you are an administrator, as you did here. It may cause confusion. Cheers, Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 01:22, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Jeepday (talk) 01:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Here I got a warning and didn't even make anymore edits after that so why warn me then ban me anyway? Bit harsh Palal!"

Decline reason: "[1], [2], [3], [4]. — -Pilotguy contact tower 01:35, 1 June 2008 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

This was before my warning.

No, those last two are after. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 01:41, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Well I never got the warning till afterwards then I thought oooh I best behave then I was banned!

It would've been at the top of every Wikipedia page you visited as soon as the warning was given; how exactly did you miss that? Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 01:46, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Thats the thing I didn't miss it did I? I just got it after and then got banned straight away a bit unfair to ban people who are just trying to improve the site with additional information I thought that was what Wikipedia was all about?

You weren't improving Wikipedia with additional information, though. Your last few edits comprised of manipulating my comment and acting like an administrator. That's hardly improving anything. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 01:49, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


That was after I made a very good edit improving a page for it to get took out saying I provided incorrect information when the information I provided was 100% correct and after I took my time out to write all that up for it to just get took out I wasn't very happy and it broke my heart.

Really? That's unfortunate. I'm sure when your block is over you can make some constructive edits. Master of Puppets Call me MoP! :) 01:54, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

I provided correct information on the second link look http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/eng_div_2/7418498.stm I get it your just a bitter Leeds fan don't worry.