User talk:90.184.4.231

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button Image:Wikisigbutton.png located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 17:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Bertilvidet 20:28, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

I have blocked your IP for 24 hours due to your edit warring. Under normal circumstances, I only block users if they continue beyond a warning, but in this case, as you have edit warred for a long time and added unsourced negative information about a living person, I have determined that this preventative action was necessary now. You have also been rather uncivil toward your opponents, which did not help to sway me against this block, either. You may contest this block by adding {{unblock|Reason}} to your talk. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 22:22, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Reason"

Decline reason: "The reason you give below does not excuse edit warring. — Yamla 22:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

Thank you for intervening. I am assuming that you have also blocked Alfons Åberg. The record will show that he was the one who began censoring my messages, whereas I was being constructive. I was always willing to change the wording, but not to delete the information, which is what he was doing, without stating a reason. I have been adding readily verifiable and highly pertinent facts. I will add citations if necessary, but I find it a bit absurd, because no-one, not even Åberg, is disputing the factual correctness of my text. They simply don't like these facts.

Note also that I have not blocked Alfons Åberg. the reason is that removing unsourced negative info on living persons is required and is an exception to our policies forbidding edit warring. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 23:03, 9 November 2007 (UTC)

Please be reasonable. Nobody is disputing the correctness of my info! The record shows that. If I come up with sources, will you let me write it and stop Åberg from deleting it?

As regards civility. The record also shows, Åberg began the name calling.