User talk:89.243.14.12

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Your edit to Embraer ERJ 135

Your recent edit to Embraer ERJ 135 (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 14:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

If you feel the redirect to Embraer ERJ 145 family should not exist on that page, you should discuss it on the article's Talk page. Copying and pasting content is going to get you nowhere.--chris.lawson 15:23, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Three-revert rule

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.--chris.lawson 15:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

You are the one undoing other peoples edits - I am spending time making this article good and you are just blanking the page and putting in a redirect.

I don't know why I'm wasting my time explaining this to you for a fifth time, but here goes. Established consensus is that the ERJ 135, ERJ 140, ERJ 145 (and variants), etc. all belong in the Embraer ERJ 145 family article. If you believe a complete, independent article can be written about the ERJ 135, discuss it on the appropriate Talk page first and establish consensus for a separate article. Unliateral page-moves and copy-n-paste jobs are considered vandalism and will be dealt with appropriately.--chris.lawson 15:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)