User talk:89.172.17.226

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

1) I have sources. You're the one that hasn't got them.
2) You are Afrika paprika, as You yourself confirmed before and do keep confirming - and please, stop with the vulgar insults. --PaxEquilibrium 20:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

1)You self-confirmed; You chained edits - just see Your (all socks') contributions - the one who is Vulgar admitted that he's Factanista, for whom Checkuser has proven that he's Afrika's sock. The 194, to which You also chain-edited, has been proven as Factanista's (a.k.a. Pygmalion's a.k.a. Zrinski's) sockpuppet; You're not really fooling anyone, You might just stop with it. I have no hard feelings against You (despite telling me to "fuck" n times), just please admit Your mistakes, register with a brand new nick and so that we can finally solve our differences. --PaxEquilibrium 21:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Who are You then? Is it You, Factanista (allegedly not Afrika paprika)? Also, I'm not an idiot - if I see an elephant approaching towards me, I'll know it's an elephant, and not something else. You say You're endorsing facts - but You yourself're fighting against facts. --PaxEquilibrium 21:15, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I am PaxEquilibrium and none other. I thought that was obvious. And now, who are You? --PaxEquilibrium 21:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

I am PaxEquilibrlium; You were supposed to say "...I am Afrika paprika...". That's what I meant. --PaxEquilibrium 21:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Well, are You Factanista then? Or who? You speak with far too much knowledge about me, the dispute and the Wikipedia as a whole to be someone else. Then again - this has nothing to do with my desire. It has only to do with what has already been proven. --PaxEquilibrium 22:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

OK. Just tell me this: 194.152.217.129‎ your other ip You occasionally use? And why have You been returning the edits of a banned troll repeatedly; and 3. Why have You said that You have argued with me, if You have never met me before and how could've You argued at Talk:Pagania if You've never been there before? :) You're twisted in Your own controversies. If You answer me these (properly), I will stop calling You Afrika paprika. Truly, --PaxEquilibrium 22:18, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

...and the other (194.) has been established through Checkuser as a sockpuppet of Factanista (and it was pretty conclusive)... logic says that You're Factanista as well then, doesn't it? --PaxEquilibrium 22:42, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

It's simple. When You file new reports, You have to give specific links to prove; the admins will never go and look through for Yourself - You have to put it all in one section, so that it's all clear and they all react the proper way. However, it seems to me that the reason why they have been ignoring You is that You're a sockpuppet. I have looked through Your changing IP, and it matches those used by Afrika paprika to curse on me (starting with 89.172... and the remainder just signifies the date), so i think that Checkuser+obvious=you being a sockpuppet. But, if you insist, I will check if there's a possibility that Checkuser is wrong - although this has never ever happened again. --PaxEquilibrium 22:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Ah... nice try; there is one major' problem: the 194..etc. is non-changing - it's static; and it was confirmed that both Factanista and Afrika paprika use that static personal IP. So, if You're 194... then You must be his (their) meat-puppet. Can You explain that? Additionally, neither Factanista nor Afrika paprika (nor Pygmalion or Zrinski) insulted me, but this changing repeating IP of Yours (and You have made chain-linked edits ever since the IP's first edits, when Afrika paprika got blocked fro 3RR, edit-warring and other forms of disruption). --PaxEquilibrium 14:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)