User talk:87.186.29.115

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Immortal Technique

Please stop changing the article to the way that it is wrong. First, leave the part with the conspiracy theories alone, it is better than saying non-mainstream views, because it tells the reader he is a conspiracy theorist, which is why there is a category for him as being a conspiracy theorist. Second, do not change the name from "THE Poverty of Philosophy" to simply "Poverty of Philosophy", the Revolutionary Vol. 1 track listing writes it like that. Third, do not change how I tried to tell the reader about the second reference, it says "Prison Planet - September 11 Ground Zero Protest Flyers" on mine, you just took out that part, even though using it like mine is more informative. Fourth, please just leave the "Viper Records official website" part as part of that link, why do you really want to write more than you have to? Fifth, when it says "babygrande.com page", I for one thought it might mean something like a MySpace page, but it is only a biography, which is why I changed it, just in case someone else is confused, it certainly doesn't do any harm. Now, please do not change "MP3" to "mp3", look at the MP3 article, it writes it as MP3 all the time, not mp3. There is no such thing as "Bin Laden" Pt. 1, only "Bin Laden", and "Bin Laden (Remix)", so you are wrong. Also please do not capitalize "discography website" (actually, you only put "site", instead of putting "website"). There is no point in doing that, Immortal Techique should be capitalized because it is his name, but look at "Viper Records official website", it is not capitalized either, so you can't have one being like that and one capitalized. Thank you. --- Efil4tselaer 19:57, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

First, you can get blocked for using words such as "stupid as fuck", I will not report you, because I know what it is like when people tell on you. Second, what does the government have to do with editing an article on Wikipedia? I for one do not believe in what the government says either, but what does that have to do with this article? How does changing your edits mean I believe in the government's lies? And if I do revert your edits, how does that make other people believe in the government's lies? Because I told you to put "Bin Laden" instead of "Bin Laden Pt. 1"? I already told you above why your edits are being changed, so please stop. --- Efil4tselaer 20:59, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Are you talking about this?

Correct me if I am wrong, but were you talking about this in your summary (the one with the government's lies):

If so, then I have changed it because it is valuable information, see here. You see, I am not one of those editors that wants to own an article, the reason your edits are being reverted is because you keep messing with the "External links" section, please just leave it the way it is, I have seen many other articles that just do it like that, so please leave it alone. I am not trying to piss you off, I am actually trying to help you, so if you don't want to be blocked (someone will report you if you keep it up), stop using insulting summaries like you did when you said I'm "stupid as fuck". I know you just said it because you were pissed, but it can get you in trouble. So, next time you want to add information like the one with the controlled demolition, just change that part and leave the external links alone, they are good the way they are, please. Thanks, see you later. --- Efil4tselaer (talk · contribs) 21:19, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User: 87.186... (Note: This is from the talk page of the Immortal Technique article)

I do not understand why you keep reverting my edits, I added categories, fixed some links such as [[2001]] to [[2001 in music]], added a link to the theory of the controlled demolition of the WTC, and a few other things. Why do you keep reverting to an old version? What you are doing is you are trying to take possession of this article, which is wrong. You keep reverting to a previous version of the page because you don't like how the "External links" section is made. Now, to show you that there is no need for how you formatted the "External links", or that it is actually wrong, I am going to use the Dr. Dre article as an example:

  • You change [http://www.viperrecords.com/ Viper Records official website] to [http://www.viperrecords.com/ viperrecords.com] Viper Records official website. What is the point of doing that? Here, look at how Dr. Dre's article links to his Aftermath Entertainment label (I am not the one that made it like that, in fact, I barely edit the article): [http://aftermath-entertainment.com/ Aftermath Entertainment website]. There, another article uses it like that, why do you keep changing it to where it says "Viper Records official website" outside those brackets?
  • You change [http://www.babygrande.com/artists.jsp?artist=14 Biography of Immortal Technique at Babygrande.com] with a free MP3 download of "Bin Laden" to [http://www.babygrande.com/artists.jsp?artist=14 babygrande.com page] with free mp3 download of ''Bin Laden'' (you used to put "Bin Laden" Pt. 1, until I told you there's only "Bin Laden", and "Bin Laden (Remix)"). First of all, when I first read that, I thought it might be something like some MySpace page or something like that, like an unofficial website or whatever, but when I checked to see what it is, I saw it is just a biography of Coronel. That is why I changed it, because it describes it better, it tells you it is a biography, not just the rather vague "babygrande.com page". Also, I am telling you to write "MP3", as "MP3", not "mp3", look at the MP3 article, it writes it as "MP3" all the time, so maybe we should write it like that article does, if they wanted to write it like "mp3", we could write it like that, but since they are writing it like "MP3", then we should use it as they are using it. I for one trust that article more than I trust you.
  • You change [http://not-in-our.name/redir/immortaltechnique/ Immortal Technique discography website] complete list of recordings to [http://not-in-our.name/redir/immortaltechnique/ Immortal Technique Discography Site] complete list of recordings. First, it is not "Site", it is "Website", so again you are wrong. Second, if we do not capitalize "Viper Records official website", then we do not capitalize "Immortal Technique discography website". You do not capitalize those words. See here [http://www.dubcc.com/forum/index.php?topic=30148.0/ Dr. Dre productions @ Dubcc.com], it only capitalizes his name, but not productions, so just leave it like that.
  • Also, you removed all of my categories (although there are other things I can say that you removed while you reverted, this is the most important one):
    • Category:Rappers known by pseudonyms
    • Category:People from Manhattan
    • Category:Freestyle rappers
    • Category:Rappers
    • Category:Underground hip hop musicians
    • Category:Hip hop musicians

You even have the nerve to call my edits vandalism, I mean, no matter what, MY edits are not vandalism, even if I am not right and you might be right in how you write those external links, my edits are certainly not vandalism, for one, if they are wrong, you did not show me any proof, or anything, and second, I am using another article as an example. Also, you are the one that is vandalizing because you removed the categories. I suggest you should stop, and stop using rude, vulgar, and insulting summaries, like when you said I'm "stupid as fuck". --- Efil4tselaer 20:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your "edits" to Immortal Technique

Again, you VANDALIZED the page, and again, I reverted your VANDALISM. Please stop VANDALIZING the Immortal Technique article, well, actually, please stop VANDALIZING Wikipedia. No matter how many times you choose to VANDALIZE, I will revert your edits, and if you keep VANDALIZING, you will be BLOCKED (AGAIN). It is probably a good idea to stop doing this. Thanks. --- Efil4tselaer 22:59, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Hi

Please stop vandalizing, it is really pathetic. Thank you, and happy editing. --- Efil4tselaer 15:11, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism

Stop vandalizing, it is pathetic, and idiotic, and your edits will ALWAYS be reverted. --- Efil4tselaer 15:01, 20 April 2007 (UTC)


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 20:28, 20 April 2007 (UTC)