User talk:85.230.176.190

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] September 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Talk:Battle of Narva (1700). Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Oxymoron83 17:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

All the remaining Russians surrendered to Charles XII's army, along with all of Peters cannons, muskets and military supplies. This left Russia's remaining armed forces with literally no equipment[9]. If Sweden, or any other aggressor, had invaded Russia immediately after Narva, Peter would have been almost powerless to stop them[10].

Look at that for example. This text is CLEARLY not neutral, i know you on wikipedia allways have the old verisions saved, and the old verision of this text was much more neutral. This text is all about making excuses for Russia to loose the battle, and it says in the beginning of the text "Narva marked the peak of Swedish power on the continent, with Russia eventually finding decisive victories to end the conflict." This text is supposed to be about this battle and this battle only. And the Perlude is only about Russia, and how unequipped and poorly drilled the russian army was while the Swedish army was the most complete army in Europe. :S I mean come ON!!! This text is CLEARLY made for the Russians advantage.


[edit] Odd edits

Hi -- can I ask what is the basis for edits like this and this? I'm not sure about the rest of your editing, but it seems like an odd patern. Feel free to respond here or on my talk page. Thanks, Mackan79 17:31, 10 September 2007 (UTC)