User talk:84.68.71.229

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Well I thought we had come to an amicable agreement, but obviously and inevitably I suppose, it doesn't seem possible.

You are attempting to present a view of a political group with which you are opposed, in an uninformed, unauthorised, and unfair way. I shall be pursuing the matter with WikiPedia.

Close the page if you wish, and I will put up an official, fair, and correct one.

I'm afraid left-wing/communist activists cannot be allowed to control international media with biased views of other Parties.

I am not a Communist; I loathe and despise Communism. I sympathise with some traditional conservatives on certain cultural matters. I simply don't believe that Wikipedia entries should only be "official" and "authorised" by the people they are about. Why, for example, have you removed all links to cited sources in the entry other than that to the NNP website itself? That hardly fits with your claim that far-right activists such as yourself would "cite sources" if you had carte blanche to write your own, completely objective Wikipedia entries about, erm, yourself. People are strongly discouraged from writing Wikipedia entries about themselves, incidentally.

I remain anonymous because attempts have been made to threaten me by activists of the far-right (perhaps even by yourself) because I had edited the NNP's entry previously. I don't feel safe editing the piece under my own name. Your contempt for other people's freedom of speech, and right to write what they want without fear of being menaced and threatened, has never been clearer. Contrary to what you and your ilk tend to think, I haven't attempted to threaten far-right activists; nor have the vast majority of people not on the far-right.

I will continue to revise the piece (note that I did *not* reinstate all the stuff about David Michael being a Nazi sympathiser and Holocaust denier, or other far-right people thinking Sharon Ebanks isn't really "one of them" because she is mixed race *even though* I provided a link to a previous version of the NNP article which had been vandalised to call it the "New Nigger Party", entirely because I thought you might accept a less detailed revision). Your idea of a "compromise" involves your version of the piece alone and makes no room for mine.

You don't have Wikipedia to yourself. It is a collaborative website. When you contribute it says at the bottom of the page "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed by others, *do not submit it*." Perhaps you ought to remember that; if you don't want other users questioning your "official" viewpoint, don't contribute at all.