User talk:84.142.76.116

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please refrain from repeatedly undoing other people's edits , as you are doing in Poland. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, please discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. Gwernol 11:56, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Blocked for edit warring

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for persistent edit warring at Poles. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} .

Gwernol 12:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

This blocked user (block log | autoblocks | rangeblocks | unblock | contribs | deleted contribs) has asked to be unblocked, but an administrator has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock request while you are blocked.

Request reason: "Sorry, I just want to stop the IP 83.22.248.100 and I reverting his vandalism. I've read the warning for me to late. I don't want to do edit-war. It's also my fault and I'm sorry for that."


Decline reason: "Your block will expire tomorrow. Provided you refrain from such actions in the future, Wikipedia will be happy to have you. -- Yamla 17:18, 30 January 2007 (UTC)"

Please make any further unblock requests by using the {{unblock}} template. However, abuse of the template may result in your talk page being protected.

[edit] Recent edit war at article Poles

You have participated in the recent edit war over the opening paragraph of the article Poles. The article has now been fully protected to prevent further edit warring. The only way to resolve this matter is for interested editors to discuss this matter. Please go to Talk:Poles#Continued_edit_war_over_opening_paragraph and express your opinion there. Please work with your fellow editors to reach a consensus wording that is properly cited and neutral. Thank you, Gwernol 12:13, 3 February 2007 (UTC)