User talk:82.71.120.62

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Thank you for experimenting with the page User talk:Windom on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Michaelas10 (Talk) 10:59, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

if jew Marx was atheist so its your problems not,mine intit?But if jew Paul comdemn so his the man of God

Atheists Karl Marx & Engels look like gays
Atheists Karl Marx & Engels look like gays

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Windom. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Michaelas10 (Talk) 11:13, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create such pages will be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Thank you. Michaelas10 (Talk) 11:17, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Michaelas10 (Talk) 11:30, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Category Reorganisations

Hi. Could I ask you to comment some of your edits? Right now it looks like you are re-organising categorizations of articles with no explanation for the rational you are using. It would just be good to understand what you're doing. Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 13:57, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

You said: "Religion and homosexuality is like God and devil.So I am right anyway". I'm sorry, I don't understand what you mean by this. Could you clarify? Thanks. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 14:02, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

I meant if you follow religion there is no place for homosexuality or perversion

OK. That's what I suspected. This is your point of view and you have a right to it. However, you cannot change Wikipedia cats in order to reflect or promote your personal viewpoint. So I'll be reverting your changes. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 14:08, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Well it is our point ,not mine or yours.We should seek the truth.

My respects

The truth is that these articles are about organisations that combine mainstream religions with groups of people defined by their sexual orientation. Whether you, or I, or anyone else, believe they are right or not is irrelevant. The truth is they do exist and should be categorised correctly. --Escape Orbit (Talk) 14:26, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Homosexuality and Judaism

I notice that you've repeatedly been trying to add Category:LGBT to this articles and other editors have removed it. The reason why it's been removed is that one of the categories already on this article Category:Homosexuality and religion, is a subcategory of Category:LGBT issues and religion, which is a subcategory of Category:LGBT. This means the article is already categorized as part of the LGBT family! Because an appropriate spot further down the Category:LGBT category tree already points to this article, adding the root directly would disrupt the categorization structure. Please bear with us on this one. If you disagree and believe there are too many subcategories, you can propose deleting some of the subcategories further down the tree and putting more articles directly in the root. Wikipedia has procedures to propose Wikipedia:Categories for deletion that you are welcome to make use of. Best, --Shirahadasha 00:28, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Category:Baptist organizations has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will (talk) 12:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)