User talk:82.43.71.244

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Luscious Lopez. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you.Vinh1313 (talk) 00:17, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did to Luscious Lopez, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Vinh1313 (talk) 14:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did to Luscious Lopez, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This includes weasel phrases such as being known for having a great ass or claiming that she is the star of some movie without providing adequate reliable citations. You've been warned many times over this including over edits made by your useraccount, Xhy20. Vinh1313 (talk) 19:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] April 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Luscious Lopez. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Tabercil (talk) 22:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


To: Vinh1313. The recent comment is factual as the majority of her movies are ass related. If you want to be 'anal' (no pun), then a percentage of ass fetish movies can be calculated from websites such as iafd.com.

  • Actually your statement is speculative rather than factual and requires a subjective determination on whether a movie qualifies as ass fetish or not that IAFD does not determine. Reread the wikipedia prohibition on original research. There shouldn't be any determination or calculation by the reader in order to advance a position. Just find a bunch of avn or xbiz articles saying that most of her movies are ass oriented and cite them. If you can't then let the reader figure that conclusion on his own without inserting your own personal conclusions. Vinh1313 (talk) 00:56, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
  • and you have to stop putting in your personal conclusions in front of unrelated citations when they don't support what you're trying to say! It is misleading and unencyclopedic to separate the legitimate citation from the statement it is supposed to verify. Vinh1313 (talk) 00:59, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Xhy20 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Vinh1313 (talk) 14:53, 9 April 2008 (UTC)