User talk:82.156.49.1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Article talk pages are not message boards or a forum for your opinions. Gamaliel 02:01, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Wikipedia

Hi. After reading your comment at Talk:Fascism, I thought that I would drop a note here. If you are interested in helping to write an encyclopedia, I'd like to welcome you to Wikipedia. You should feel free to contribute to both articles and article talk pages. You are even free to ensure that your point-of-view is represented. Having said that, it is very important that you understand Wikipedia policies. One important policy is Wikipedia:No original research. Another is citing sources. I would especially like to draw your attention to the community standards for discussion here. This edit suggests that you may not be assuming good faith from those that disagree with you. As Gamaliel mentioned above, Wikipedia is not a message forum, and it is important to restrict oneself to concise comments that are directed solely at improving articles. Finally, please reconsider signing your posts as "anti-Idiotarian". It is needlessly inflammatory, and is likely to lead to other editors suspecting that you are less interested in Wikipedia's Neutral point of view policy, given that the phrase is associated with a particular political position. Thank you for considering the above. Jkelly 23:45, 22 November 2005 (UTC)


====Regarding edits made during May 17, 2006 (UTC)====

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Charles, Prince of Wales, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thanks. If this is an IP address, and it is shared by multiple users, ignore this warning if you did not make any malicious edits. Bachrach44 21:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Please note, this is not the place to pish your personal point of view. --Bachrach44 21:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. -- KOS | talk 18:58, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edits to Iraq

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 16:33, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Michael Schumacher. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- AuburnPilottalk 01:12, 5 November 2006 (UTC) 01:12, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- AuburnPilottalk 01:42, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Demiurge 16:10, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for experimenting with the page Vanessa Redgrave on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Dina 21:58, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Danielle Gamba

This is the only warning you will receive.
Your recent vandalism will not be tolerated. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PTO 21:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Muhammad

Your recent edit to Muhammad (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 03:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

How many last warning he will get? Please block him. --- ALM 03:05, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edit to Muhammad:

Your recent edit to Muhammad (diff) was reverted by automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either vandalism, link spam, or test edits to the page. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. Thanks! // VoABot II 03:04, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] February 2007

Please do not deliberately introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Nursultan Nazarbayev. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Kusma (討論) 13:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bubbler Ranx

I've replaced your deletion request with the appropriate template. For future requests, please tag the page at the top with {{subst:prod|reason why it should be deleted}} Tra (Talk) 22:27, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Last warning

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to Cockroach, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NawlinWiki 00:45, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you to adhere to Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy for editors. Thank you. ViridaeTalk 02:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)