User talk:81.243.6.193

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Regarding edits made during February 2, 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. I see you have been experimenting but your latest edit was determined to be unhelpful, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Please note that continued unhelpful edits may result in your account being blocked. Thanks. Glen 09:47, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] March 2

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.--Looper5920 12:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ancient Rome 10:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy for editors, which you appear to have violated at Ancient Rome. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Robotman1974 10:57, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] May 9, 2007: vandalism warning

Kappen met die onzin, zoals op Wesley Sneijder. De eerstvolgende keer dat je onzin toevoegt aan Wikipedia word je geblokkeerd. AecisBrievenbus 15:14, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Vandalism to Otto von Bismarck

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Otto von Bismarck, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your changes have been automatically reverted by CounterVandalismBot. If this is a mistake, please report it. Thank you. CounterVandalismBot 13:06, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Otto von Bismarck, you will be blocked from editing. James086Talk | Email 13:09, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] January 18, 2008: RE: International School of Brussels Rugby Match

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to International School of Brussels. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

Please quit adding the fact that the school lost a minor rugby match because nobody cares. Provide a reliable source, like a newspaper article, etc. to prove it's notable. If you can't, quit being a nuisance. --Zabadab (Talk) @ 16:34, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

You're just censoring the result. Are you a communist by any chance?

  • I am not censoring anything; I don't even go to that school. It's simply that nobody who is trying to find out information about the school cares about the result. People will read the article on the International School of Brussels to find information about the schhol, not to find rugby results. Now if you would please stop being a nuisance, I would appreciate it. I don't want to engage in an edit war so if you continue to be a nuisance I'll turn this over to an administrator. --Zabadab (Talk) @ 09:53, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

I have no intention of being a nuisance or "waging war", I'd just like to point out that if any student would like to join a school to purposely join the rugby team as an outside school activity, they should not attend ISB as their rugby team is obviously incompetent.

Furthermore, seeing as you do not attend this school, I fail to understand why you wish to "clean up" their page. If they would not want this result at their wikipedia page, don't you think they would remove this themselves?

  • I clean up their page because I can do so; it's that easy. If they edit the article themselves you'd probably go about and whine at them for doing so too. If you're so proud of winning against ISB, tell the webmaster of your school's website (European School of Mol?) or the webmaster of ISB to add it to their website, where things like sports results belong. And with "they should not attend ISB as their rugby team is obviously incompetent." you're proving that you're simply editing the article to include your opinion on the team -- which Wikipedia is not for. Wikipedia is for facts, not for your opinion or original research. --Zabadab (Talk) @ 19:34, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to International School of Brussels.
Any further vandalism will result in you being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tiptoety talk 20:03, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] January 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to European School, Mol has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. – Gurch 15:58, 31 January 2008 (UTC)