User talk:81.218.238.113

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please review Wikipedia:Neutral Point of View which describes the appropriate way of describing topics which may be disputed. Dragons flight 02:22, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)

I fear you have a severe misunderstanding of the scientific method and process or the Wikipedia NPOB policy or both. In the form you just tried, a change in General relativity et al looks rather impossible. Please use the article's talk pages for further discussion of the topics. Also, you already in violation of our policy WP:3RR. --Pjacobi 16:05, 2005 Jun 9 (UTC)

Do not remove other users' comments on your talk page. For further info, see here.-->Energy (talk) 16:21, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Geometric Physical Theory

I do not understand "geometric physical theory". Can you explain it? WCFrancis 17:11, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Response posted to my user page and now on my talk page:

Reply moved from my User page:

Hallo,
General relativity tries to explain gravitation as a geometric phenomena instead of a series of discrete particle interactions.
Cheers -- 81.218.238.113 17:35, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I would suggest that you make an attempt to build consensus on the talk pages for the articles you have been editing, rather than just reverting repeatedly. Wikipedia is based on neutral point of view (referred to as NPOV) and consensus regarding content. Wikipedia:Wikiquette provides guidelines for editors to go by. WCFrancis 19:33, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Please stop making controversial edits to established pages without first opening a discussion on the talk pages. Your edits have been reverted and will continue to be in the future. If you are going to make claims about the validity of generally accepted theories, you need to not only make them in a manner which is not derogatory to the proponents of the theories, but also to support your claims -- neither of which, in my opinion, you have done. You do not seem to understand the meaning of "theory" as the word is used in science. I would suggest you learn a bit about the scientific method before you try to make any further edits to science articles on Wikipedia. --24.118.220.84 00:20, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Don't you have a better way to spend your time? --Fastfission 04:33, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Warning

Hello. Your conduct here is very disruptive at the moment. Your edits to general relativity are repeatedly inserting your own point of view, and you're not engaging in any sensible discussion or citing your sources. This is verging on vandalism, and if it continues, you may be blocked from editing. Also, it's bad form to blank a talk page, especially for an IP address which may not be exclusively yours. Please do not remove other people's comments from this talk page. You could consider registering for an account. Worldtraveller 15:16, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

You've been asked several times not to blank talk pages, and you have continued to make unsourced changes to general relativity which are against the consensus. If you continue edit like this, I will have to block you for persistent disruptive behaviour. Worldtraveller 16:39, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)