User talk:81.198.226.118

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Please do not add unhelpful and non-constructive information to Wikipedia, as you did to Dixie Chicks. Your edits could be considered vandalism, and they have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Xiner (talk, email) 02:07, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Link

Sorry, but Wikipedia guidelines about external links state that, if your site is noteworthy, it will be added by someone else, not the owner. Also, the site is rather new and is still not that important. Maybe in a couple of years. -- ReyBrujo 19:17, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] site promotion

You are here to promote your sites.

There is a copyright issue with your cheat sheets, you fail to request permission (ie from grymoire) and/or give credit to the original authors of the source you copy (gpl or gfpl).

BTw, Your cheat sheets are not even good, being a simple copy paste of the man pages, compare for instance your ed cheat sheet with others.

Please remove your links, some of them (sed, bash, digg) have already been removed for several reasons, stop trying to put them back —Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.124.141.250 (talk) 08:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

[edit] Re: Link

That is not enough for Wikipedia. What I can offer you is to post a note at the Digg talk page to ask whether the external link is suitable. Personally, that Digg has an article does not mean a site trying to "fill a void" in the article subject is notable enough, but maybe they will agree with you. -- ReyBrujo (talk) 01:49, 17 November 2007 (UTC)