User talk:81.19.57.130

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Dear 81.19.57.130 - or may I call you 81.19,

I suspect you are the same person as 195.93.21.67, your activities have now been reported on the vandalism page. I don't like fascists or vandals, when they are combined in the same person ...

I think the best quote regarding the BUF is from The Code of the Woosters:
The trouble with you, Spode, is that just because you have succeeded in inducing a handful of half-wits to disfigure the London scene by going about in black shorts, you think you’re someone. You hear them shouting ‘Heil Spode!’ and you imagine it is the Voice of the People. That is where you make your bloomer. What the Voice of the People is saying is, "Look at that frightful ass Spode swanking about in footer bags! Did you ever in your puff see such a perfect perisher?"
-- The Anome 15:14, Mar 8, 2005 (UTC)

Do not vandalise articles by changing correct spellings to incorrect ones, or by altering phrases to insert your POV without any justification for it. Warofdreams 15:58, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Blanking of List of conflicts in South America

Please do not remove content from Wikipedia; it is considered vandalism. If you want to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Afonso Silva 12:17, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to Nicolle Wallace

Your recent edit to Nicolle Wallace (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 10:46, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] SAS article

Whilst I note that you appear to have strong feelings about the use of the Regminet emblem on the article persistent deletion is probably not the best approach. If you can provide a photograph of the cap badge that would be extremely useful, but until then a drawn representation seems perfcetly reasonable. Please discuss on the article talk page to reach an consensus decision. ALR 14:47, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reversions

Please note that your persistent reversion of the image in the SAS article may lead you to breaching the three revert rule and may lead to a period of block. Please take your issue to the talk page to discuss your concerns and potential routes to an agreed approach.ALR 14:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Ruislip

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Ben W Bell talk 08:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Your edit to my userpage

Firstly, please don't edit my userpage to communicate with me, use my talk page. I have not been involved in the blocking of any IPs recently and can't help. However, I'd suggest you read the page on Vandalism as you might not realise what it is - that edit to my userpage could look like vandalism (and will be if you do it any more), so watch out. If you've any further comments, don't hesitate to make them on my talk page.