User talk:81.152.87.36

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] Talk pages

Thank you for your message. Firstly, I do not keep deleting other users comments. A few of your comments were removed firstly by another user as you know full well because you reverted their removal of your comments, so why not leave them a message too, as they were the first to remove your comments? Secondly, I have only removed the comments you made which broke wikipedia guidelines on how to post on talk pages. Perhaps if you take the time to check the guidelines you will see what I mean. Thirdly, at least one of your comments was in response to a comment made 12 months ago, so it was hardly "perfectly legitimate points in discussion of articles" - as there was no discussion, just long forgotten comments which you decided to comment on again. Fourthly, I did not remove all of your comments, I did though add the "unsigmed comment" tag after two of your last comments. As I am sure you are already aware, comments left on talk pages should be signed by typing four tildes. Fifthly I have archived the talk page as it was both too long and contained long since dead dicsussions that do not need dragging up again. If you wish to discuss anything relevant to the article then start new topics instead of replying to comments made 12 months ago. And I would strongly advise you to stick to the topic of the article and comments on how to improve the article. Any other comments are liable to be removed because wikipedia is not a discussion forum. Comments on the talk pages of articles are not intended for general discussion of that topic.

As for this, "How do you expect Wiki articles to improve, if you stick your own POV everywhere?" I think not as I make sure, especially on articles relating to Tibet, that the articles are as NPPV as possible. Try checking before you make unfounded accusations, and you will find that recently I have removed some clear PRO-Tibetan independence posts on the Tibet article for instance. That is hardly the actions of someone as you claim who "sticks their own POV everywhere". However, I will also continue to edit the articles to try and ensure they are as neutral as possible from both views, something which you clearly seem to misunderstand. And re-reading some of your talk page comments today, you accuse me of sticking my POV everywhere? Talk about the pot calling the kettle blac. All your comments were highly POV, controversial and mostly just general discussion, and raking up long forgotten comments. Perhaps if you took the time to register on wikipedia you might be able to contribute more. ♦Tangerines♦·Talk 02:17, 10 August 2007 (UTC)